Monday, July 15, 2019

Indian Paintings in oxford Part 6

A hero greeted by princes 
Illustration to the musical mode Kanada ragini
Bikaner, Rajasthan, c.1680. By Ruknuddin
Gouache with gold on paper; 16.2 x 13 cm
Ashmolean Museum (EA 1990.6; purchased with the help of the Friends of the Ashmolean) The musical mode Kanada (or Karnata) is named after the Karnataka region of South India, where it may have originated as a hunting melody. This ragini is visualised as a princely warrior, blue-skinned like the god Krishna, who has shown his valour by slaying an elephant. He holds a sword and a severed tusk and he wears a sliver of ivory in his right ear. Since elephants were far too highly valued in India to be hunted in this way, the subject may allude to the story of Krishna's defeat of Kuvalayapida, the demonic elephant of the wicked King Kamsa. Greeting the victorious hero with raised hands are a Rajput prince and his younger companion. An attendant waves a fly-whisk, an emblem of royalty.
This picture is an example of the refined style developed in the late seventeenth century by immigrant Muslim artist families at the Rajput court of Bikaner, in the deserts of western Rajasthan. This early Bikaner style combined Mughal technique with influences from the Deccan. The Maharajas of Bikaner spent long periods campaigning with the imperial armies in the
Deccan or serving there as military governors. The dispersed ragamala series to which this page belonged was made for Maharaja Anup Singh (b.1638, r.1669-98) by his leading artist, Ruknuddin. The conventional iconographic grouping of the four standing figures is treated by Ruknuddin with Mughal finesse of line and Deccani subtlety of colouring. As well as being a successful general, Anup Singh was a Sanskrit scholar and notable patron of the arts. He had a particular love of music, preserving important musical treatises in his library and employing at Bikaner talented performers who had been banished (like the imperial painters) from the court of the pious Aurangzeb. In this painting the leading prince who greets the elephant-slayer resembles portraits of Anup Singh. Such identification with his patron may perhaps have been intended by Ruknuddin. Anup Singh's military career in the south mainly took place in eastern Karnataka, the region which lends its name to this Ragini. It was there, as governor at Adoni. that he eventually died.
Lovers at daybreak 
Illustration to the musical mode Raga Vibhasa Northern Deccan or southern Rajasthan,
c.1675, Gouache with silver and gold on paper;
19.7x15cm
Ashmolean Museum (EA 1991.154)
Vibhasa ('brightness' or 'radiance') is a musical air played at dawn. Its pictorial image is a noble couple who have passed a night of love together. At daybreak the lady remains languorously asleep on the intricately patterned coverlet. Her lover rises and puts on one slipper, while brandishing a luxuriant floral bow and arrow, like that of the love-god Kama. In some versions, he is shown aiming an arrow at a cock crowing, as if to prevent the day from coming. But here the peacock on the roof remains unscathed. An atmosphere of muted splendour is created by the artist's confident use of decorative detail and the combination of warm colours with more modulated tones. While the iconography and motifs such as the gold sun with human face adhere to the Rajasthani pictorial tradition, the palette suggests Deccani influence. Rajput nobles serving with the Mughal forces in the
Deccan patronised local artists or occasionally brought them back to Rajasthan. It is uncertain where this particular ragamala was painted. It has a Rajasthani provenance, attested by old inventory marks from the Mewar royal collection. Twenty-one of its pages are known to survive, of which two are in the Ashmolean.
Maharana Raj Singh I of Mewar riding 
Udaipur (Mewar), Rajasthan, c.1670
Gouache with gold on paper; 29.2 x 23 ern
Ashmolean Museum (EA 1991.153)
The Maharanas of Mewar, whose ancestors tenaciously resisted successive Muslim invaders, are considered the premier Rajput chiefs. They capitulated to the Mughals only in 1615, forty years after their fellows, and on terms allowing them a greater degree of independence. For much of the seventeenth century Mewar artists continued to produce robustly expressive manuscript illustrations deriving from the indigenous Early Rajput style. Mughal conventions of portraiture only became established at Udaipur towards the end of the century.
In this early example of Mewar portraiture, Maharana Raj Singh (r.1652-80) rides a rearing, dappled blue horse, starkly silhouetted against a sheer red ground. He wears a flowered gold robe of Mughal type, and he had in fact attended the imperial court as a prince. But his portrait typically reveals an ideal of Rajpul martial heroism more than a closely observed individual. His mustache is flowing, his eye staring and slightly bloodshot. He raises a hand in a gesture of command. Above a thickly brushed white horizon a gold sun blazes, symbolising the legendary descent of the Mewar chiefs from the Sun-god; the gold and black royal parasol held by an attendant is also a solar symbol. The
Maharana's heroic aspect is appropriate, for he was the last Mewar ruler to be a successful warrior. A very similar portrait of Raj Singh, with an olive-green back-ground is dated 1670 (present location unknown).
Maharana Amar Singh worshipping at Eklingji 
Udaipur, Rajasthan, c.1700-05
Gouache with gold and silver on paper; 48 x 55 cm
Ashmolean Museum (EA 1989.40; Purchased with the help of the Friends of the Ashmolean)  Maharana Amar Singh II of Mewar (r.1698-1710), the grandson of Raj Singh I (21), is seen at worship at the temple of Eklingji, attended by priests, musicians, and the royal entourage. A manifestation of Shiva, Eklingji is worshipped in the form of a lingam (phallic icon) with four human faces. He is the ancient tutelary deity of the Mewar rulers. Royal processions from Udaipur, the
capital from the late sixteenth century, to the temple of Eklingji, in a hilly defile to the north, were a regular state function. Amar Singh sits before the deity, which is adorned with jewels, garlands and canopies and cobras in gold and silver. A Brahmin priest and assistant officiate. In the courtyard, attendants carry regalia and musicians of the court and temple play horns, cymbals and drums. Other members of the royal escort stand outside in the temple enclosure. Beyond the outer wall, mahouts and grooms wait with the elephants and horses. The temple architecture is depicted schematically, but with enough detail in the superstructure to be recognisable. The agile temple monkeys and their young are seen on the roofs and in the wooded background. Brush drawing on a plain ground predominates and colours and gold are only sparingly used, yet this is a completed work. It is an exceptionally large and elaborate example of the finely stippled semi-grisaille style often employed by the leading artist of Arnar Singh's reign. This anonymous master did much to consolidate
Mughal conventions of portraiture at Udaipur, though these were thoroughly assimilated to the bolder Rajput vision. Here, the delicate execution of individual figures and animals is combined with a deliberately simplified setting.
Muhammad Shah riding 
Mughal, c.1720-25
Gouache with gold and silver on paper; 39 x 26.8 ern
Bodleian Library (MS Ouseley Add. 173, f.27)
In the reign of Muhammad Shah (1719-48) the Mughal empire crumbled but art continued to flourish. Known as Rangila ('Pleasure-loving'), the insouciant Emperor devoted himself to the enjoyment of poetry, music, fine wine and food and beautiful women. If news arrived of some military setback he would console himself by contemplating his magnificent gardens. This went on for twenty years. But in 1739 Nadir Shah of Persia sacked Delhi and took away a huge treasure, including the Peacock Throne of Shah Jahan. If Muhammad Shah's empire was more show than
substance, so also is this portrait, in which he strikes a martial attitude borrowed from equestrian portraits of the genuinely bellicose Aurangzeb, some sixty years earlier. He appears helmeted, chainmailed and armed with lance, bow and quivers in readiness for battle. He displays not just one but a double radiant nimbus. His rearing charger also is splendidly arrnoured. hennaed and tasselled. The background is the traditional pale green of earlier Mughal portraiture, and the foreground receding to a near horizon is strewn conventionally with flowers and grass tufts. Above, a portentous gold-red  light fringes the puffy snailshell clouds. High among the clouds, the Emperor's name is inscribed in tiny letters. The illusion of imperial glory is evoked with the technical mastery of the Mughal studio in better days.






Indian Paintings in oxford Part 5


Shah Jahan enthroned 
Mughal, c.1638
Gouache with gold on paper; 24.2 x 14.3 ern
Bodleian Library (MS Douce Or.a.1, f.9r)
Under the Emperor Jahangir Mughal portraiture reached its zenith, not only in the dispassionate recording of human individuality (9) but as a means of imperial self-aggrandisement. Under Shah Jahan (1627-58) this propagandist strain became dominant. Here he is symbolically shown as World Ruler (as his name signiAes). Seated on an ornate throne, probably at Agra Fort, he holds a jewelled lance and an orb representing heaven and earth. Such ceremonial enthronements were part of
the elaborate court ritual. In October 1637 the tenth anniversary of Shah Jahan's accession was celebrated: In commemoration of the occasion, the King of the seven climes proceeded with God-given fortune to the Forty- Pillared Hall of Public Audience and ascended the Jewelled Throne. According to the yearly custom, gold and pearls were lavishly distributed from his munificent hands, and fell upon his obedient subjects like auspicious rays from the all-powerful sun.'
Immersed in sumptuously coloured and patterned surfaces, the Emperor assumes iconic status. His face in profile is rendered with great finesse in the stippling of flesh and treatment of the slightly greying hair and beard. His radiant solar nimbus stands out from the golden throne-back through the artist's textured striation and stippling of the gold surfaces. The jeweled throne, with pearl-fringed canopy, displays European baroque features such as its foliated scrolling wings. The throne cushions, carpet and the Emperor's surcoat, robe and sash are an opulent mass of floral ornament. The natural flowers set against the green background are arranged with similar formality in this apotheosis of imperial grandeur.
Shah Jahan receives 'Ali Mardan Khan
Mughal, c.1640. Attributed to Payag
Gouache with gold on paper; 34.5 x 23.8 ern
Bodleian Library (MS Ouseley Add. 173, no. 13)
In November 1638 Shah Jahan received with honour at Lahore the Persian general 'Ali Mardan Khan, who had helpfully surrendered to him the strategic frontier city of Qandahar. 'Ali Mardan Khan was rewarded with the governorship of Kashmir. He later rendered outstanding service as a designer of gardens, canals and other public works. In this durbar scene the Persian nobleman appears among the throng of courtiers on the left, wearing a splendid flowered robe and saluting the Emperor with hand raised to his forehead. In keeping with the protocol of the time (so different from the informality of
early Mughal court scenes, 2), the figures appear frozen in a tableau, depending hierarchically from the majestic figure of the ruler. Each is an acutely observed portrait. Attributable to the gifted and versatile artist Payag, this composition closely resembles the durbar scenes of the Padshahnama, the illustrated history of Shah Jahan's reign now in the Royal Library at Windsor, and was probably intended for that manuscript.
As in many of Shah Jahan's portraits (13), there is a well-developed imperial symbolism. Flanked by attendants with yak-tail fans, the Emperor is shown with a gold nimbus on the throne balcony in his hall of audience. The princes Dara Shikoh and Murad Bakhsh and the minister Asaf Khan stand to the left. Painted angels (inspired by European art, like the royal nimbus) gaze down from the walls. In the panel below the throne are depicted the scales of justice, the lion eating with the cow, and Sufi shaikhs holding a globe and sword. The Emperor is thus personified as perfect bestower of justice and peace, and master of both spiritual and temporal worlds. Around' Ali Mardan Khan are grouped Mughal courtiers and his own Persian entourage, who bring jewelled gifts and a string of horses for the Emperor. A closely related painting, formerly in a Benares private collection (fig. 6), shows the Persian nobleman being respectfully escorted by ministers to the hall of audience beforehand, with the royal musicians playing in the background.

The minister Sa'dullah Khan presiding at an assembly
Muqhal. c.1655
Gouache with gold on paper; 40.5 x 28.8 ern
Bodleian Library (MS Douce Or.b.3, no.21)
Sa'dullah Khan, the able and learned prime minister of  Shah Jahan, presides over a durbar assembly on an open terrace. Enthroned under smaller and greater canopies, he gives orders or judgements to the officers ranked before him. A state elephant and caparisoned horses await the minister and grandees in front of the partition railing. To the fore of the crush of attendant figures on the left are two Europeans in ruffs and black hats.
Shah Jahan prized his loyal minister and deeply mourned his death in 1656, two years before his own
dethronement by his son Aurangzeb. This painting of Sadullah Khan shows him as the authoritative executive of the Emperor's will, with the entourage and panoply appropriate to his office. The Mughal state machine is seen in smooth and ruthless action. The over-arching canopy strikes a grandiloquent note with its gold brocade interior with flowering scrollwork, the latter amplified above in the less disciplined, more ominous rhythms of the tightly bunched cloud curlicues.

A prince with a narcissus 
Mughal, c.1640-50
Gouache with gold on paper; 17.2 x 11.5 ern
Bodleian Library (MS Douce Or.a.1, f.45v)
In the more introspective mode of Mughal painting (2), princes are shown withdrawn from the tumult of the hunting, war and court ceremonial, absorbed instead in solitary contemplation with a book, flower or wine-cup in secluded gardens, in the society of a favourite concubine, or else in solemn spiritual discussion with grey- beard shaikhs.
In this painting a young prince of refined sensibility sits on a high-backed chair among flowering shrubs and slender trees. Wine-flasks and cups and a vase of flowers stand within reach. He is lost in reverie as he smells a narcissus; in Persian poetry narcissi are associated both with the spring and with the languorous eyes of the beloved. The subject, setting, and palette recall the Persianate aestheticism found in earlier Deccani painting and in the work of the artists Farrukh Beg and Muhammad 'Ali. A contrasting note of agitation is struck by the Mughal hunting carpet with a leopard pursuing blackbuck, which seems to wheel about the flower-vase.
Sultan 'Abdullah Qutubshah of Golconda Golconda, Deccan, c.1640 
Gouache with gold and silver on paper;
12.5 x 9.8 cm
Ashmolean Museum (EA 1960.203)
As Mughal domination of the Deccan increased during the seventeenth century, imperial conventions of portraiture (13) became influential in the now tributary Sultanates of Golconda and Bijapur. The local artists tended to reinterpret these models with a subtle richness of colour and a poetic, often languorous, quality that is typically Deccani. The youthful Sultan 'Abdullah Qutubshah (r. 1626-72) had been compelled to accept Mughal sovereignty in 1636. In a painting of slightly later date, he is shown seated formally on a low throne set on a terrace with an attenuated garden beyond. He displays a radiant nimbus of Mughal type, while his hand rests martially on his sword-hilt. In reality' Abdullah was indolent and ineffectual: 'all his time was given to ingenious forms of sensuality' (Sir Jadunath Sarkar). His administration was run by his mother. The Sultan's character is conveyed less by the sword and nimbus than by the refined modeling of his dreamy, thick-lipped countenance, combined with the decorative splendor of his flowered gold robe.
Prince Ram Singh of Amber at worship Amber, Rajasthan, c.1660 
Gouache with gold and silver on paper; detail
17 x 12 cm. approx
Ashmolean Museum (EA 1994.46)
The Rajput prince Ram Singh of Amber (b.1635) performs his devotions in a garden setting. Bare-chested and with hair tied back, he recites invocations or mantras with the aid of prayer-beads held under the end of his muslin shawl. Ablution vessels are placed before him, with a conch-shell on a stand and brass stamps and sandal-paste for imprinting sectarian marks. The small raised platform on which he sits is set at an unusually oblique angle to the background, with its blossoming trees and massed clouds. The clouds were partly repainted when the picture (which had been trimmed)
was enlarged by a less skilful artist, before being mounted in its album page (fig. 7). While the sensitive portraiture, with fine stippled shading of the face and torso, indicates that the artist had received Mughal training, the freer interpretation of the setting suggests this may be an early work of the local Amber (later, Jaipur) school. am Singh is reputed to have been a devout Hindu and less happy than his predecessors in his required attendance at the Mughal court under Aurangzeb. He earned the lasting displeasure of the Emperor, who suspected him of complicity in the escape of the Maratha leader Shivaji from Agra. When Ram Singh became ruler of Amber in 1667, Aurangzeb sent him off to govern the remote and unhealthy border region of Assam in the north-east. But he survived this. Further postings followed on the north-western Khyber frontier, where Ram Singh died in 1688.








Indian Paintings in oxford Part 4

The dying 'Inayat Khan 
Mughal school, 1618
Gouache on paper; 12.4 x 15.4 cm
Bodleian Library (MS Ouseley Add. 171, f.4v.)
This chill and moving study of a dying courtier is one of the most famous of all Mughal portraits. Wasted by his opium addiction and alcoholism, "lnayat Khan was brought before Jahangir to obtain leave to journey to Agra, on the day before his death. The Emperor was both appalled and fascinated by his condition. He described the occasion in his memoirs: On this day news came of the death of 'Inayat Khan. He was one of my intimate attendants. As he was addicted to opium, and when
he had the chance, to drinking as well, by degrees he became maddened with wine. As he was weakly built, he took more than he could digest, and was attacked by the disease of diarrhoea, and in this weak state he two or three times fainted. By my order Hakim Rukna applied remedies, but whatever methods were resorted to gave no profit .They put him into a palanquin and brought him. He appeared so low and weak that I was astonished. 'He was skin drawn over bones'. Or rather his bones, too, had dissolved. Though painters have striven much in drawing an emaciated face, yet I have never seen anything like this, nor even approaching it. Good God, can a son of man come to such a shape and fashion? As it was a very extraordinary case I directed painters to take his portrait.
The artist too was clearly moved by the scene of human extremity. This painting and the preparatory brush-drawing in Boston (fig. 4), even starker in its rendering of the debilitated physique, have been attrib used by Prof. S. C. Welch to the master Govardhan. Both pictures in different ways convey the same intense pathos. Here the subdued white, grey and tan tones of the interior complement the deadened colours of the cushions, garments and coverlet. The background composition, with a palely insubstantial carpet and bottles in niches and a thin decorative arabesque panel acting as counter-balance, resembles a washed-out Mondrian in its rectangular formality. Shading round the looming silhouettes of the cushions and the wall and niche surrounds give them a shimmering, phantasmagoric quality. The dominant image remains the emaciated pallour of 'Inayat Khan's face, torso and hands. His wintry blue eye (reflecting the eau-de-nil cushion) stares in profile, like a courtier still at attention before the Emperor, yet also with the poignant fixity of ultimate resignation.
A girl snake-charmer 
From the Laud Ragamala: an illustration to the
musical mode Asavari ragini
Sub-imperial Mughal style, c.1615. Attributed to
Fazl
Gouache with gold on paper; 15.1 x 10.6 cm
Bodleian Library (Laud MS Or. 149, f.19r.) From the sixteenth century, ragamala ('Garland of ragas') became one of the most popular pictorial subjects in Northern India and the Deccan, uniting the main  court arts of music, poetry and painting. The essential quality of each of the ragas (musical modes) and their associated raginis (or 'wives') was evoked in Sanskrit or Hindi verses and depicted in paintings, according to established conventions. A full ragamala comprised thirty-six or more pictures. This is one of eighteen surviving pages from an early seventeenth century series, which belong to a historic album presented to the Bodleian by Archbishop Laud in 1640. Asavari is a plaintive mode, said to originate in a snake-charmers' melody and usually performed in the early morning hours. The ragini is depicted as a dark-skinned tribal girl wearing a skirt of leaves. She dwells alone in mountain forests, where her presence charms the snakes down from the sandal-trees. Garlanded with snakes, she sits on a rock from which a stream gushes.
In the absence of her lover, she communes with the entranced cobra held in her hand. The colours are mostly subdued, and birds, rocks and vegetation are reduced to simplified, rhythmical forms. This style is typical of those lesser Mughal artists of the early seventeenth century who fell short of imperial standards but found commissions with Hindu and Muslim courtiers. The Laud Ragamala pages have recently been attributed to Fazl, who is known to have worked for the leading sub-imperial patron, 'Abdul-Rahirn Khan-i-Khanan. commander-in-chief of the Mughal armies.
An ascetic by a lotus pool 
Illustration to the musical mode Devagandhara ragini
Bundi. Rajasthan, c.1650
Gouache with gold on paper; 21.9 x 12.4 ern
Ashmolean Museum (Mrs M. Barrett Loan)
The musical mode Devagandhara, performed in the morning after sunrise, is conceived as a solitary lady whom the pain of separation from her lover has transformed into an emaciated ascetic. Here only the yogi's jewelled ornaments reveal a vestige of his femininity, though the domed pavilion standing for his hermitage is more like a palace bed-chamber. Its projecting finial in the form of a makara (aquatic monster) holding a bright orange-red pennant syrnbolises the love-god Kama. Signs of natural fecundity abound, with banana and mango trees, harmonious pairs of cranes and ducks, and flowering lotuses. The yogi sits apparently withdrawn, telling his prayer-beads inside a gomukhi bag while toying with a stray strand of hair. This ragini exhibits a commonly found tension between the erotic and ascetic moods, between sensual enjoyment and holy renunciation.
Al Bundi and its near neighbour Kotah in the south-east Rajasthan numerous series of ragamala pictures were produced, both in wall-paintings and on paper. They derive iconographically from a dispersed ragamala, painted in 1591 at Chunar near Benares by artists trained at the Mughal court, which must have been in Bundi possession at this date or not long after. Indigenous Bundi painters interpreted the same subjects in their own robust style, often, as here, recrealing the given theme with a strong flavour of the appropriate rasa or mood.


A dervish receiving a visitor 
Bijapur, Deccan, c.1610-20 
Gouache with gold and silver on paper; 
25.8 x 19.5 ern 
Bodleian Library (MS Douce Or.b.2, f.4v.) 
In this masterpiece of Bijapur painting, now damaged by flaking, a venerable Sufi is seated on a prayer platform of his shrine retreat. With his hunched frame and overgrown beard and nails, he is clearly a recluse of some sanctity. The shrine has a low dome with pennants flying from a bamboo flagstaff, a group of Shi'ite religious standards, and between them, a luxuriant banyan with a large white parrot and a waterskin on a tripod below. On the left, bullocks are watered from a trough and a monkey could originally be seen on a perch: such obliterated details are fortunately preserved in an eightteenth century copy by the Oudh painter Mihr Chand A dervish visitor in a shawl of penitential white is being introduced by a younger companion holding a fly whisk and drum. The visitor's eyes are closed, in humility or perhaps because of blindness. Like most of the figures present, he bears ritual marks on his fore-arms. He too is a person of consequence, for a seated fakir in the foreground gestures towards him, while cosseting a fat-tailed sheep; glowingly stippled in gold and black. The other fakir beside him (his face now lost) also gazed at the visitor. 
We do not know who the dervish and his visitor are. It has been remarked that the latter bears a resemblance to Sultan Ibrahim Adilshah of Bijapur, a great connoisseur of music, art, and poetry, for whom this picture was very probably made. Could the Sultan have chosen to be depicted as a dervish humbling himself before a revered shaikh? Because of his unorthodox leanings towards Hindu culture, Ibrahim is known to have been rebuffed by several eminent Bijapur Sufis of the time. One of these, Shah Abu'l Hasan Qadiri, succeeded in diverting him from his devotion to a Hindu yogi who was said to have revived the Sultan's dead daughter by singing a raga to her. However this may be, 
it remains a painting of great refinement, combining brilliantly detailed observation with a pervasive mood of serenity.