Showing posts with label law. Show all posts
Showing posts with label law. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 17, 2020

RESIGNATION OF JOGENDRA NATH MANDAL, MINISTER FOR LAW AND LABOUR, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN: Part 2

In continuation of  Part 1: 

http://thoughtcrackers.blogspot.com/2020/11/resignation-of-jogendra-nath-mandal.html

Leave your email id in the comment to get a copy of this resignation in Hindi/English.  


Reference:  Recurrent Exodus of Minorities from East Pakistan and Disturbances in India: a Report to the 
Indian Commission of Jurists by its Committee of Enquiry, 1965. Published by: Purushottam Trikamdas, General Secretary, Indian Commission of Jurists, New Delhi, 1965, Appendices IV, p.354-372  

BACKGROUND OF THE RIOT

21. The reasons for the Dacca riot were mainly five:

(i) To punish the Hindus for the daring action of their representatives in the Assembly in their expression of protest by walking out of the Assembly when two adjournment motions on Kalshira and Nachole affairs were disallowed.

(ii) Dissension and differences between the Suhrawardy Group and the Nazimuddin Group in the Parliamentary Party were becoming acute.

(iii) Apprehension of launching of a movement for re-union of East and West Bengal by both Hindu and Muslim leaders made the East Bengal Ministry and the Muslim League nervous. They wanted to prevent such a move. They though that any large-scale communal riot in East Bengal was sure to produce reactions in West Bengal where Muslims might be killed. The result of such riots in both East and West Bengal, it was believed, would prevent any movement for re-union of Bengals.

(iv) Feeling of antagonism between the Bengali Muslims and non-Bengali Muslims in East Bengal was gaining ground. This could only be prevented by creating hatred between Hindus and Muslims of East Bengal. The language question was also connected with it and

(v) The consequences of nondevaluation and the Indo- Pakistan trade deadlock to the economy of East Bengal were being felt most acutely first in urban and rural areas and the Muslim League members and officials wanted to divert the attention of the Muslim masses from the impending economic breakdown by some sort of Jihad against Hindus.

STAGGERING DETAILS - NEARLY 10,000 KILLED:

22. During my nine days’ stay at Dacca, I visited most of the riot affected areas of the city and suburbs. I visited Mirpur also under P.S. Tejgaon. The news of the killing of hundreds of innocent Hindus in trains, on railway lines between Dacca and Narayanganj, and Dacca and Chittagong gave me the rudest shock. On the second day of Dacca riot, I met the Chief Minister of East Bengal and requested him to issue immediate instructions to the District authorities to take all precautionary measures to prevent spreading of the riot in district towns and rural areas. On the 20th February 1950, I reached Barisal town and was astounded to know of the happenings in Barisal. In the District town, a number of Hindu houses were burnt and a large number of Hindus killed. I visited almost all riot-affected areas in the District. I was simply puzzled to find the havoc wrought by the Muslim rioters even at places like Kasipur, Madhabpasha and Lakutia which were within a radius of six miles from the District town and were connected with motorable roads.  At the Madhabpasha Zamindar’s house, about 200 people were killed and 40 injured. A place,called Muladi, witnessed a dreadful hell. At Muladi Bandar alone, the number killed would total more than three hundred,as was reported to me by the local Muslims including some officers. I visited Muladi village also, where I found skeletons of dead bodies at some places. I found dogs and vultures eating corpses on he river-side. I got the information there that after the whole-scale killing of all adult males, all the young girls were distributed among the ringleaders of the miscreants. At a place called Kaibartakhali under P.S. Rajapur, 63 persons were killed. Hindu houses within a stone’s throw distance from the said thana office were looted, burnt and inmates killed. All Hindu shops of Babuganj Bazar were looted and then burnt anda large number of Hindus were killed. From detailed information received, the conservative estimate of casualties was placed at 2,500 killed in the District of Barisal alone. Total casualties of Dacca and East Bengal riot were estimated to be in the neighbourhood of 10,000 killed. The lamentation of women and children who had lost their all including near and dear ones melted my heart. I only asked myself “What was coming to Pakistan in the name of Islam.”

NO EARNEST DESIRE TO IMPLEMENT DELHI PACT

23. The large scale exodus of Hindus from Bengal commenced in the latter part of March. It appeared that within a short time all the Hindus would migrate to India. A war cry was raised in India. The situation became extremely critical. A national calamity appeared to be inevitable. The apprehended disaster, however, was avoided by the Delhi Agreement of April 8. With a view to reviving the already lost morale of the panicky Hindus, I undertook an extensive tour of East Bengal. I visited a number of places of the districts of Dacca, Barisal, Faridpur, Khulna and Jessore. I addressed dozens of largely attended meetings and asked the Hindus to take courage and not to leave their ancestral hearths and homes. I had this expectation that the East Bengal Govt. and Muslim League leaders would implement the terms of the Delhi Agreement. But with the lapse of time, I began to realise that neither the East Bengal Govt nor the Muslim League leaders were really earnest in the matter of implementation of the Delhi Agreement. The East Bengal Govt. was not only ready to set up a machinery as envisaged in the Delhi Agreement, but also was not willing to take effective steps for the purpose. A number of Hindus who returned to native village immediately after the Delhi Agreement were not given possession of their homes and lands which were occupied in the meantime by the Muslims.

MOULANA AKRAM KHAN’S INCITATIONS

24. My suspicion about the intention of League leaders was confirmed when I read editorial comments by Moulana Akram Khan, the President of the Provincial Muslim League in the “Baisak” issue of a monthly journal called ‘Mohammadi’. In commenting on the first radio-broadcast of Dr.A.M.Malik, Minister for Minority Affairs of Pakistan, from Dacca Radio Station, wherein he said, “Even Prophet Mohammed had given religious freedom to the Jews in Arabia”, Moulana Akram Khan said, “Dr. Malik would have done well had he not made any reference in his speech to the Jews of Arabia. It is true that the Jews in Arabia had been given religious freedom by Prophet Mohammed; but it was the first chapter of the history. The last chapter contains the definite direction of prophet Mohammed which runs as follows:- “Drive away all the Jews out of Arabia”. Even despite this editorial comment of a person who held a very high position in the political, social and spiritual life of the Muslim community, I entertained some expectation that the Nurul Amin Ministry might not be so insincere. But that expectation of mine was totally shattered when Mr. Nurul Amin selected D.N. Barari as a Minister to represent the minorities in terms of the Delhi Agreement which clearly states that to restore confidence in the minds of the minorities one of their representatives will be taken in the Ministry of East Bengal and West Bengal Govt.

NURUL AMIN GOVERNMENT’S INSINCERITY

25. In one of my public statement, I expressed the view that the appointment of D.N.Barari as a Minister representing the minorities not only did not help restore any confidence, but, on the contrary, destroyed all expectations illusions, if there was any in the minds of the minorities about the sincerity of Mr.Nurul Amin’s Govt. My own reaction was that Mr.Nurul Amin’s Govt. was not only insincere but also wanted to defeat the principal objectives of the Delhi Agreement. I again repeat that D.N.Barari does not represent anybody except himself. He was returned to the Bengal Legislature Assembly on the Congress ticket with the money and organisation of the Congress. He opposed the Scheduled Caste Federation candidates. Some time after his election, he betrayed the Congress and joined the Federation. When he was appointed a Minister he had ceased to be a member of the Federation too. I know that East Bengal Hindus agree with me that by antecedents, character and intellectual attainments Barari is not qualified to hold the position of a Minister as envisaged in the Delhi Agreement.

26. I recommended three names to Mr.Nurul Amin for this office. One of the persons I recommended was an MA., LL.B., Advocate, Dacca High Court. He was Minister for more than 4 years in the first Fazlul Huq Ministry in Bengal. He was chairman of the Coal Mines Stowing Board, Calcutta, for about 6 years. He was the senior Vice-President of the Scheduled Caste Federation. My second nominee was a B.A., LL.B. He was a member of the Legislative Council for 7 years in the pre-reform regime. I would like to know what earthly reasons there might be for Mr.Nurul Amin in not selecting any of these two gentlemen and appointing instead a person whose appointment as Minister I strongly objected to for very rightly considerations. Without any fear of contradiction, I can say that this action of Mr.Nurul Amin in selecting Barari as a Minister in terms of the Delhi Agreement is conclusive proof that the East Bengal Govt. was neither serious nor sincere in its professions about the terms of the Delhi Agreement whose main purpose is to create such conditions as would enable the Hindus to continue to live in East Bengal with a sense of security to their life, property, honor, and religion.

GOVERNMENT PLAN TO SQUEEZE OUT HINDUS

27. I would like to reiterate in this connection my firm conviction that East Bengal Govt. is still following the well-planned policy of squeezing Hindus out of the Province. In my discussion with you on more than one occasion, I gave expression to this view of mine. I must say that this policy of driving out Hindus from Pakistan has succeeded completely in West Pakistan and is nearing completion in East Pakistan too. The appointment of D.N.Barari as a Minister and the East Bengal Government’s unceremonious objection to my recommendation in this regard strictly conform to name of what they call an Islamic State. Pakistan has not given the Hindus entire satisfaction and a full sense of security. They now want to get rid of the Hindu intelligentsia so that the political, economic and social life of Pakistan may not in any way be influenced by them.

EVASIVE TACTICS TO SHELVE JOINT ELECTORATE:

28. I have failed to understand why the question of electorate has not yet been decided. It is now three years that the minority Sub-Committee has been appointed. It sat on three occasions. The question of having joint or separation electorate came up for consideration at a meting of the Committee held in December last when all the representatives of recognised minorities in Pakistan expressed their view in support of Joint Electorate with reservation of seats for backward minorities. We, on behalf of the Scheduled Castes, demanded joint electorate with reservation of seats for Scheduled Castes. This matter again came up for consideration at a meeting called in August last. But without any discussion whatsoever on this point, the meeting was adjourned sine die. It is not difficult to understand what the motive is behind this kind of evasive tactics in regard to such a vital matter on the part of Pakistan’s rulers.

DISMAL FUTURE FOR HINDUS:

29. Coming now to the present condition and the future of Hindus in East Bengal as a result of the Delhi Agreement, I should say that the present condition is not only unsatisfactory but absolutely hopeless and that the future completely dark and dismal. The confidence of Hindus in East Bengal has not been restored in the least. The Agreement is treated as a mere scrap of paper alike by the East Bengal Government and the Muslim League. That a pretty large number of Hindus migrants, mostly Scheduled Caste cultivators are returning to East Bengal is no indication that confidence has been restored. It only indicates that their stay and rehabilitation in West Bengal, or elsewhere in the Indian Union have not been possible. The sufferings of refugee life are compelling them to go back to their homes. Besides, many of them are going back to bring movable articles and settle or dispose of immovable properties. That no serious communal disturbance has recently taken place in East Bengal is not to be attributed to the Delhi Agreement. It could not simply continue even if there were no Agreement or Pact.

30. It must be admitted that the Delhi Pact was not an end in itself. It was intended that such conditions would be created as might effectively help resolve so many disputes and conflict existing between India and Pakistan. But during this period of six months after the Agreement, no dispute or conflict has really been resolved. On the contrary, communal propaganda and anti-India propaganda by Pakistan both at home and abroad are continuing in full swing. The observance of Kashmir Day by the Muslim League all over Pakistan is an eloquent proof of communal anti-India propaganda by Pakistan. The recent speech of the Governor of Punjab (Pak) saying that Pakistan needed a strong Army for the security of Indian Muslims has betrayed the real attitude of Pakistan towards India. It will only increase the tension between the two countries.

WHAT IS HAPPENING IN EAST BENGAL TODAY:

31. What is today the condition in East Bengal? About fifty lakhs of Hindus have left since the partition of the country. Apart from the East Bengal riot of last February, the reasons for such a large scale exodus of Hindus are many. The boycott by the Muslims of Hindu lawyers, medical practitioners, shopkeepers, traders and merchants has compelled Hindus to migrate to West Bengal in search of their means of livelihood. Wholesale requisition of Hindu houses even without following due process of law in many and non-payment of any rent whatsoever to the owners have compelled them to seek for Indian shelter. Payments of rent to Hindu landlords was stopped long before. Besides, the Ansars against whom I received complaints all over are a standing menace to the safety and security of Hindus. Inference in matters of education and methods adopted by the Education Authority for Islamisation frightened the teaching staff of Secondary Schools and Colleges out of their old familiar moorings. They have left East Bengal. As a result, most of the educational institutions have been closed. I have received information that some time ago the Educational Authority issued a circular in Secondary Schools enjoining compulsory participation of teachers and students of all communities in recitation from the Holy Koran before the school work commenced. Another circular requires Headmasters of schools to name the different blocks of the premises after 12 distinguished Muslims, such as, Jinnah, Iqbal, Liaquat Ali, Nazimuddin, etc. Only very recently in an educational conference held at Dacca, the President disclosed that out of 1,500 High English Schools in East Bengal, only 500 were working. Owing to the migration of Medical Practitioners there is hardly any means of proper treatment of patients. Almost all the priests who used to worship the household deities at Hindu houses have left. Important places of worship have been abandoned. The result is that the Hindus of East Bengal have got now hardly any means to follow religious pursuits and performance of social ceremonies like marriage where the services of a priest are essential. Artisans who made images of gods and goddesses have also left. Hindu Presidents of Union Boards have been replaced by Muslims by coercive measures with the active help and connivance of the police and Circle Officers. Hindu Headmasters and Secretaries of Schools have been replaced by Muslims. The Life of the few Hindu Govt. servants has been made extremely miserable as many of them have either been superseded by junior Muslims or dismissed without sufficient or any cause. Only very recently a Hindu Public Prosecutor of Chittagong was arbitrarily removed from service as has been made clear in a statement made by Srijukta Nellie Sengupta against whom at least no change of anti-Muslim bias prejudice or malice can be levelled.

HINDUS VIRTUALLY OUTLAWED

32. Commission of thefts and dacoities even with murder is going on as before. Thana offices seldom record half the complaints made by the Hindus. That the abduction and rape of Hindu girls have been reduced to a certain extent is due only to the fact that there is no Hindu girl between the ages of 12 and 30 living in East Bengal at present. The few depressed class girls who live in rural areas with their parents are not even spared by Muslim goondas. I have received information about a number of incidents of rape of Scheduled Caste Girls by Muslims. Full payment is seldom made by Muslims buyers for the price of jute and other agricultural commodities sold by Hindus in market places. As a matter of fact, there is no operation of law, justice or fair-play in Pakistan, so far as Hindus are concerned.

FORCED CONVERSIONS IN WEST PAKISTAN:

33. Leaving aside the question of East Pakistan, let me now refer to West Pakistan, especially Sind. The West Punjab had after partition about a lakh of Scheduled Castes people. It may be noted that a large number of them were converted to Islam. Only 4 out of a dozen Scheduled Castes girls abducted by Muslims have yet been recovered in spite  of repeated petitions to the Authority. Names of those girls 24 with names of their abductors were supplied to the government. The last reply recently given by the Officer-in-Charge of recovery of abducted girls said that “his function was to recover Hindu girls and ‘Achhuts’ (Scheduled Castes) were not Hindus”. The condition of the small number of Hindus that are still living in Sind and Karachi, the capital of Pakistan, is simply deplorable. I have got a list of 363 Hindu temples and gurdwaras of Karachi and Sind (which is by no means an exhaustive list) which are still in possession of Muslims. Some of the temples have been converted into cobbler’s shops, slaughter houses and hotels. None of the Hindus has got back. Possession of their landed properties were taken away from them without any notice and distributed amongst refugees and local Muslims. I personally know that 200 to 300 Hindus were declared non-evacuees by the Custodian a pretty long time ago. But up till now properties have no been restored to any one of them. Even the possession of Karachi Pinjirapole[ii][2] has not been restored to the trustees, although it was declared nonevacuee property sometime ago. In Karachi I had received petitions from many unfortunate fathers and husbands of abducted Hindu girls, mostly Scheduled Castes. I drew the attention of the 2nd Provisional Government to this fact. There was little or no effect. To my extreme regret I received information that a large number of Scheduled Castes who are still living in Sind have been forcibly converted to Islam.

PAKISTAN ‘ACCURSED’ FOR HINDUS

34. Now this being, in brief, the overall picture of Pakistan so far as the Hindus are concerned, I shall not be unjustified in stating that Hindus of Pakistan have to all intents and purposes been rendered “Stateless” in their own houses. They have no other fault than that they profess the Hindu religion. Declarations are being repeatedly made by Muslim League leaders that Pakistan is and shall be an Islamic State. Islam is being offered as the sovereign remedy for all earthly evils. In the matchless dialectics of capitalism and socialism you present the exhilarating democratic synthesis of Islamic equality and fraternity. In that grand setting of the Shariat Muslims alone are rulers while Hindus and other minorities are zimmies who are entitled to protection at price, and you know more than anybody else Mr. Prime Minister, what that price is. After anxious and prolonged struggle I have come to the conclusion that Pakistan is no place for Hindus to live in and that their future is darkened by the ominous shadow of conversion or liquidation. The bulk of the upper class Hindus and politically conscious scheduled castes have left East Bengal. Those Hindus who will continue to stay accursed in Pakistan will, I am afraid, by gradual stages and in a planned manner be either converted to Islam or completely exterminated. It is really amazing that a man of your education, culture and experience should be an exponent of a doctrine fraught with so great a danger to humanity and subversive of all principles of equality and good sense. I may tell you and your fellow workers that Hindus will allow themselves, whatever the treat or temptation, to be treated as Zimmies in the land of their birth. Today they may, as indeed many of them have already done, abandon their hearths and homes in sorrow but in panic. Tomorrow they strive for their rightful place in the economy of life. Who knows what is in the womb of the future? When I am convinced that my continuance in office in the Pakistan Central Government is not of any help to Hindus I should not with a clear conscience, create the false impression in the minds of the Hindus of Pakistan and peoples abroad that Hindus can live there with honour and with a sense of security in respect of their life, property and religion. This is about Hindus.

NO CIVIL LIBERTY EVEN FOR MUSLIMS:

35. And what about the Muslims who are outside the charmed circle of the League rulers and their corrupt and inefficient bureaucracy? There is hardly anything called civil liberty in Pakistan. Witness for example, the fate of Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan than whom a more devout Muslim had not walked this earth for many years and of his gallant patriotic brother Dr. Khan Sahib. A large number of erstwhile League leaders of the Northwest and also of the Eastern belt of Pakistan are in detention without trial. Mr. Suhrawardy to whom is due in a large measure the League’s triumph in Bengal is for practical purpose a Pakistani prisoner who has to move under permit and open his lips under orders. Mr. Fazlul Haq, that dearly loved grand old man of Bengal, who was the author of that now famous Lahore resolution, is ploughing his lonely furrow in the precincts of the Dacca High Court of Judicature, and the so called Islamic planning is as ruthless as it is complete. About the East Bengal Muslims general, the less said the better. They were promised of autonomous and sovereign units of the independent State. What have they got instead? East Bengal has been transformed into a colony of the western belt of Pakistan, although it contained a population which is larger than that of all the units of Pakistan put together. It is a pale ineffective adjunct of Karachi doing the latter’s bidding and carrying out its orders. East Bengal Muslims in their enthusiasm wanted bread and they have by the mysterious working of the Islamic State and the Shariat got stone instead from the arid deserts of Sind and the Punjab.

MY OWN SAD AND BITTER EXPERIENCE:

36. Leaving aside the overall picture of Pakistan and the callous and cruel injustice done to others, my own personal experience is no less sad, bitter and revealing.  You used your position as the Prime Minister and leader of the Parliamentary Party to ask me to issue a statement, which I did on the 8th September last. You know that I was not willing to make a statement containing untruths and half truths, which were worse that untruths. It was not possible for me to reject your request so long as I was there working as a Minister with you and under your leadership. But I can no longer afford to carry this load of false pretensions and untruth on my conscience and I have decided to offer my resignation as your Minister, which I am hereby, placing in your hands and which, I hope, you will accept without delay. You are of course at liberty to dispense with that office or dispose of it in such a manner as may suit adequately and effectively the objectives of your Islamic State.

Yours sincerely,

Sd./- J.N. Mandal

9th October 1950

We have tried our best to check facts. However, We are humans. Human nature is to make a mistake. So please verify facts, if you feel we are wrong. We are sorry for that. In case you find any mistake in our web post, then inform us. We will try to rectify it. English to Hindi translations is not in literal sense. In case of any problem, Please prefer the English version.  Please do not use social media for news. Before believing any news on social media, confirm it from any reliable source. We Tried Our best to include as many as historical facts possible but We are unable to include many things. You should use these web post only as guidance and try to Study more. 

RESIGNATION OF JOGENDRA NATH MANDAL, MINISTER FOR LAW AND LABOUR, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN: Part 1

Leave your emailid in the comment to get a copy of this resignation in Hindi/English.  

Read Part 2: http://thoughtcrackers.blogspot.com/2020/11/blog-post.html


Reference:  Recurrent Exodus of Minorities from East Pakistan and Disturbances in India: a Report to the 
Indian Commission of Jurists by its Committee of Enquiry, 1965. Published by: Purushottam Trikamdas, General Secretary, Indian Commission of Jurists, New Delhi, 1965, Appendices IV, p.354-372  

FULL TEXT OF THE LETTER OF RESIGNATION DATED 8TH OCTOBER 1950 OF JOGENDRA NATH MANDAL, MINISTER FOR LAW AND LABOUR, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, ADDRESSED TO LIAQUAT ALI KHAN, PRIME MINISTER OF PAKISTAN.

My dear Prime Minister,

It is with a heavy heart and a sense of utter frustration at the failure of my lifelong mission to uplift the backward Hindu masses of East Bengal that I feel compelled to tender the resignation of my membership of your cabinet. It is proper that I should set forth in detail the reasons which have prompted me to take this decision at this important juncture of the Indo-Pakistani subcontinent.

1. Before I narrate the remote and immediate causes of my resignation, it may be useful to give a short background of the important events that have taken place during the period of my co-operation with the League. Having been approached by a few prominent League leaders of Bengal in February 1943, I agreed to work with them in the Bengal Legislative Assembly. After the fall of the Fazlul Haq ministry in March 1943, with a party of 21 Scheduled Caste M.L.A.s, I agreed to cooperate with Khwaja Nazimuddin, the then leader of the Muslim League Parliamentary Party who formed the Cabinet in April 1943. Our co-operation was conditional on certain specific terms, such as the inclusion of three Scheduled Caste Ministers in the Cabinet, sanctioning of a sum of Rupees Five Lakhs as an annual recurring grant for the education of the Scheduled Castes, and the unqualified application of the communal ratio rules in the matter of appointment to Government services.

2. Apart from these terms, the principal objectives that prompted me to work in cooperation with the Muslim League was, first, that the economic interests of the Muslims in Bengal were generally identical with those of the Scheduled Castes. Muslims were mostly cultivators and labourers, and so were members of the Scheduled Castes. One section of Muslims were fishermen, so was a section of the Scheduled Castes as well, and secondly that the Scheduled Castes and the Muslims were both educationally backward. I was persuaded that my cooperation with the League and its Ministry would lead to the undertaking on a wide scale of legislative and administrative measures which, while promoting the mutual welfare of the vas bulk of Bengal’s population and undermining the foundations of vested interest and privilege would further the cause of communal peace and harmony. It may be mentioned here that Khwaja Nazimuddin took three Scheduled Caste Ministers in his cabinet and appointed three Parliamentary Secretaries from amongst the members of my community.

SUHRAWARDY MINISTRY:

3. After the general elections held in March 1946, Mr. H.S.Suhrawardy became the leader of the League Parliamentary Party in March 1946 and formed the League Ministry in April 1946. I was the only Scheduled Caste member returned on the federation ticket. I was included in Mr. Suhrawardy’s Cabinet. The 16th day of August of that year was observed in Calcutta as ‘The Direct Action Day’ by the Muslim League. It resulted, as you know, in a holocaust. Hindus demanded my resignation from the League Ministry. My life was in peril. I began to receive threatening letters almost every day. But I remained steadfast to my policy. Moreover, I issued an appeal through our journal ‘Jagaran’ to the Scheduled Caste people to keep themselves aloof from the bloody feud between the Congress and the Muslim League even at the risk of my life. I cannot but gratefully acknowledge the fact that I was saved from the wrath of infuriated Hindu mobs by my Caste Hindu neighbours. The Calcutta carnage was followed by the ‘Noakhali Riot’ in October 1946. There, Hindus, including Scheduled Castes, were killed, and hundreds were converted to Islam. Hindu women were raped and abducted. Members of my community also suffered the loss of life and property. Immediately after these happenings, I visited Tipperah and Feni and saw some riot-affected areas. The terrible sufferings of Hindus overwhelmed me with grief, but still, I continued the policy of co-operation with the Muslim League. Immediately after the massive Calcutta Killing, a no-confidence motion was moved against the Suhrawardy Ministry. It was only due to my efforts that the support of four Anglo-Indian Members and of four Scheduled Caste members of the Assembly who had hitherto been with the Congress could be secured, but for which the Ministry would have been defeated.

4. In October 1946, most unexpectedly came to me through Mr. Suhrawardy the offer of a seat in the Interim Government of India. After a good deal of hesitation and being given only one hour’s time to take my final decision, I consented to accept the offer subject to the condition only that I should be permitted to resign if my leader Dr. B.R. Ambedkar disapproved of my action. Fortunately, however, I received his approval in a telegram sent from London. Before I left for Delhi to take over as Law Member, I persuaded Mr. Suhrawardy, the then Chief Minister of Bengal, to agree to take two Ministers in his Cabinet in my place and to appoint two Parliamentary Secretaries from the Scheduled Case Federation group.

5. I joined the Interim Government on November 1, 1946. After about a month, when I paid a visit to Calcutta, Mr.Suhrawardy apprised me of the communal tension in some parts of East Bengal, especially in Gopalganj Sub-division, where the Namahsudras were in majority, being very high. He requested me to visit those areas and address meetings of Muslims and Namahsudras. The fact was that Namahsudras in those areas had made preparations for retaliation. I addressed about a dozen of largely attended meetings. The result was that Namahsudras gave up the idea of retaliation. Thus an inevitable dangerous communal disturbance was averted.

6. After a few months, the British Government made their June 3 Statement (1947), embodying certain proposals for the partition of India. The whole country, especially the entire non-Muslim India, was startled. For the sake of truth, I must admit that I had always considered the demand of Pakistan by the Muslim League as a bargaining counter. Although I honestly felt that in the context of India as a whole, Muslims had legitimate cause for grievance against upper-class Hindu chauvinism, I held the view very strongly indeed that the creation of Pakistan would never solve the communal problem. On the contrary, it would aggravate communal hatred and bitterness. Besides, I maintained that it would not ameliorate the condition of Muslims in Pakistan. The inevitable result of the partition of the country would be to prolong, if not perpetuate, the poverty, illiteracy, and miserable condition of the toiling masses of both the States. I further apprehended that Pakistan might turn to be one of the most backward and undeveloped countries of South East Asia.

LAHORE RESOLUTION:

7. I must make it clear that I have thought that an attempt would be made, as is being done at present, to develop Pakistan as a purely ‘Islamic’ State based on the Shariat and the injunctions and formulae of Islam. I presumed that it would be set up in all essentials after the pattern contemplated in the Muslim League resolution adopted at Lahore on March 23, 1940. That resolution stated inter alia that (I) “geographically contiguous areas are demarcated into regions which should be constituted with such territorial readjustments as may be necessary, that the areas in which the Muslims are numerically in majority as in the north-western and eastern zones of India, should be grouped to constitute independent states in which the constituent units shall be autonomous and sovereign” and (II) “adequate, effective and mandatory safeguards should be specifically provided in the Constitution for minorities in these units and in these regions for the protection of their religious, cultural, political, administrative and other rights and interests in consultation with them.” Implicitly in this formula were (a) that Northwestern and eastern Muslim zones should be constituted into two independent States, (b) that the constituent units of these States should be autonomous and sovereign, (c) that minorities’ guarantee should be in respect of rights as well as of interest and extend to every sphere of their lives, and (d) that Constitutional provisions should be made in these regards in consultation with the minorities themselves. I was fortified in my faith in this resolution and the professions of the League Leadership by the statement Qaid-e-Azam Mohammed Ali Jinnah was pleased to make on the 11th August 1947 as the President of the Constituent Assembly giving solemn assurance of equal treatment for Hindus & Muslims alike and calling upon them to remember that they were all Pakistanis. There was then no question of dividing the people on the basis of religion into full-fledged Muslim citizens and zimmies being under the perpetual custody of the Islamic State and its Muslim citizens. Every one of these pledges is being flagrantly violated, apparently to your knowledge and with your approval in complete disregard of the Qaid-e-Azam’s wishes and sentiments and to the detriment and humiliation of the minorities.

PARTITION OF BENGAL

8. It may also be mentioned in this connection that I was opposed to the partition of Bengal. In launching a campaign in this regard, I had to face not only tremendous resistance from all quarters but also unspeakable abuse, insult, and dishonour. With great regret, I recollect those days when 32 crores of Hindus of this Indo-Pakistan Sub-continent turned their back against me and dubbed me as the enemy of Hindus and Hinduism, but I remained undaunted and unmoved in my loyalty to Pakistan. It is a matter of gratitude that my appeal to 7 million Scheduled Caste people of Pakistan evoked a ready and enthusiastic response from them. They lent me their unstinted support, sympathy, and encouragement.

9. After the establishment of Pakistan on August 14, 1947 you formed the Pakistan Cabinet, in which I was included, and Khwaja Nazimuddin formed a provisional Cabinet for East Bengal. On August 10, I had spoken to Khwaja Nazimuddin at Karachi and requested him to take 2 Scheduled Caste Ministers in the East Bengal Cabinet. He promised to do the same sometime later. What happened subsequently in this regard was a record of unpleasant and disappointing negotiations with you, Khwaja Nazimuddin and Mr. Nurul Amin, the present Chief Minister of East Bengal. When I realised that Khwaja Nazimuddin was avoiding the issue on this or that excuse, I became almost impatient and exasperated. I further discussed the matter with the Presidents of the Pakistan Muslim League and its East Bengal Branch. Ultimately, I brought the matter to your notice. You were pleased to discuss the subject with Khwaja Nazimuddin in my presence at your residence. Khwaja Nazimuddin agreed to take one Scheduled Caste Minister on his return to Dacca. As I had already become skeptical about the assurance of Khwaja Nazimuddin, I wanted to be definite about the time-frame. I insisted that he must act in this regard with a month, failing which I should be at liberty to resign. Both you and Khwaja Nazimuddin agreed to the condition. But alas! you did not perhaps mean what you said. Khwaja Nazimuddin did not keep his promise. After Mr. Nurul Amin had become the Chief Minister of East Bengal, I again took up the matter with him. He also followed the same old familiar tactics of evasion. When I again called your attention to this matter prior to your visit to Dacca in 1949, you were pleased to assure me that Minority Ministers would be appointed in East Bengal, and you asked 2/3 names from me for consideration. In stat deference to your wish, I sent you a note stating the Federation Group in the East Bengal Assembly and suggesting three names. When I made enquiries as to what had happened on your return from Dacca, you appeared to be very cold and only remarked: “Let Nurul Amin return from Delhi.” After a few days, I again pressed the matter. But you avoided the issue. I was then forced to come to the conclusion that neither you not Mr. Nurul Amin had any intention to take any Scheduled Caste Minister in the East Bengal Cabinet. Apart from this, I was noticing that Mr. Nurul Amin and some League leaders of East Bengal were trying to create disruption among the Members of the Scheduled Caste Federation. It appeared to me that my leadership and wide-spread popularity were considered ominous. My outspokenness, vigilance, and sincere efforts to safeguard the interests of the minorities of Pakistan, in general, and of the Scheduled Caste, in particular, were considered a matter of annoyance to the East Bengal Govt. and few League leaders. Undaunted, I took my firm stand to safeguard the interests of the minorities of Pakistan.

ANTI-HINDU POLICY

10. When the question of partition of Bengal arose, the Scheduled Caste people were alarmed at the anticipated dangerous result of partition. Representation on their behalf were made to Mr. Suhrawardy, the then Chief Minister of Bengal, who was pleased to issue a statement to the press declaring that none of the rights and privileges hitherto enjoyed by the Scheduled Caste People would be curtailed after partition and that they would not only continue to enjoy the existing rights and privileges but also receive additional advantages. This assurance was given by Mr. Suhrawardy not only in his personal capacity but also in his capacity as the Chief Minister of the League Ministry. To my utter regret, it is to be stated that after partition, particularly after the death of Qaid-e-Azam, the Scheduled Castes have not received a fair deal in any matter. You will recollect that from time to time, I brought the grievances of the Scheduled Castes to your notice. I explained to you on several occasions the nature of inefficient administration in East Bengal. I made serious charges against the police administration. I brought to your notice incidents of barbarous atrocities perpetrated by the police on frivolous grounds. I did not hesitate to bring to your notice the anti-Hindu policy pursued by the East Bengal Government, especially the police administration and a section of Muslim League leaders.

SOME INCIDENTS:

11. The first incident that shocked me took place at a village called Digharkul near Gopalganj, where on the false complaint of a Muslim, brutal atrocities were committed on the local Namahsudras. The fact was that a Muslim who was going in a boat attempted to throw his net to catch fish. A Namahsudra, who was already there for the same purpose, opposed the throwing of the net in his front. This was followed by some altercation, and the Muslim got annoyed and went to the nearby Muslim village and made a false complaint that he and a woman in his boat had been assaulted by the Namahsudras. At that time, the S.D.O. of Gopalganj was passing in a boat through the canal, who, without making any enquiry, accepted the complaint as true and sent armed police to the spot to punish the Namahsudras. The armed police came, and the local Muslims also joined them. They not only raided some houses of the Namahsudras but mercilessly beat both men and women, destroyed their properties, and took away valuables. The merciless beating of a pregnant woman resulted in abortion on the spot. This brutal action on the part of the local authority created panic over a large area.

12. The second incidence of police oppression took place in the early part of 1949 under P.S. Gournadi in the district of Barisal. Here a quarrel took place between two groups of members of a Union Board. One group which was in the good books of the police conspired against the opponents on the plea of their being Communists. On the information of a threat of attack on the Police Station, the O.C., Gournadi requisitioned armed forces from the headquarters. The Police, helped by the armed forces, then raided a large number of houses in the area, took away valuable properties, even from the house of absentee-owners who were never in politics, far less in the Communist Party. A large number of persons over a wide area were arrested. Teachers and students of many High English Schools were Communist suspects and unnecessarily harassed. This area being very near to my native village, I was informed of the incident. I wrote to the District Magistrate and the S.P. for an enquiry. A section of the local people also prayed for an enquiry by the S.D.O. But no enquiry was held. Even my letters to the District authorities were not acknowledged. I then brought this matter to the notice of the highest Authority in Pakistan, including yourself but to no avail.

 WOMEN FOR MILITARY:

13. The atrocities perpetrated by the police and the military on the innocent Hindus, especially the Scheduled Castes of Habibgarh in the District of Sylhet deserve description. Innocent men and women were brutally tortured, some women ravished, their houses raided, and properties looted by the police and the local Muslims. Military pickets were posted in the area. The military not only oppressed these people and took away stuff forcibly from Hindu houses but also forced Hindus to send their womenfolk at night to the camp to satisfy the carnal desires of the military. This fact also I brought to your notice. You assured me of a report on the matter, but unfortunately, no report was forthcoming.

14. Then occurred the incident at the Nachole in the District of Rajshahi was in the name of suppression of Communists, not only the police but also the local Muslims in collaboration with the police oppressed the Hindus and looted their properties. The Santhals then crossed the border and came over to West Bengal. They narrated the stories of atrocities wantonly committed by the Muslims and the police.

 15. An instance of callous and coldblooded brutality is furnished by the incident that took place on December 20, 1949 in Kalshira under P.S. Mollarhat in the District of Khulna. What happened was that late at night, four constables raided the house of one Joydev Brahma in village Kalshira in search of some alleged Communists. At the scent of the police, half a dozen young men, some of whom might have been Communists, escaped from the house. The police constable entered the house and assaulted the wife of Joydev Brahma, whose cry attracted her husband and a few companions who escaped from the house. They became desperate, re-entered the house, found 4 constables with one gun only. That perhaps might have encouraged the young men who struck a blow on an armed constable who died on the spot. The young men then attacked another constable when the other two ran away and raised the alarm, which attracted some neighbouring people who came to their rescue. As the incident took place before sunrise when it was dark, the assailants fled with the dead body before the villagers could come. The S.P. of Khulna with a contingent of military and armed police appeared on the scene in the afternoon of the following day. In the meantime, the assailants fled, and the intelligent neighbours also fled away. But the bulk of the villagers remained in their houses as they were absolutely innocent and failed to realise the consequence of the happening. Subsequently, the S.P., the military, and armed police began to beat mercilessly the innocents of the entire village, encouraged the neighbouring Muslims to take away their properties. A number of persons were killed, and men and women were forcibly converted. House-hold deities were broken, and places of worship were desecrated and destroyed. Several women were raped by the police, military, and local Muslims. Thus a veritable hell was let loose not only in the village of Kalshira, which is 1-1/2 miles in length with a large population but also in a number of neighbouring Namahsudra villages. The village Kalshira was never suspected by the authority to be a place of Communist activities. Another village called Jhalardanga, which was at a distance of 3 miles from Kalshira, was known to be a center of Communist activities. This village was raided by a large contingent of police on that day for the hunt of the alleged Communists, a number of whom fled away and took shelter in the aforesaid house of village Kalshira which was considered to be a safe place for them.

16. I visited Kalshira and one or two neighbouring villages on the 28th February 1950. The S.P., Khulna and some of the prominent League leaders of the district were with me. When I came to the village Kalshira, I found the place desolate and in ruins. I was told in the presence of S.P. that there were 350 homesteads in this village; of these, only three had been spared, and the rest had been demolished. Country boats and heads of cattle belonging to the Namasudras had been all taken away. I reported these facts to the Chief Minister, Chief Secretary, and Inspector of General of Police of East Bengal and to you.

17. It may be mentioned in this connection that the news of this incident was published in West Bengal Press, and this created some unrest among the Hindus there. A number of sufferers of Kalshira, both men and women, homeless and destitute, had also come to Calcutta and narrated the stories of their sufferings, which resulted in some communal disturbances in West Bengal in the last part of January.

CAUSES OF THE FEBRUARY DISTURBANCE

18. It must be noted that stories of a few incidents of communal disturbance that took place in West Bengal as a sort of repercussion of the incidents at Kalshira were published in exaggerated form in the East Bengal press. In the second week of February 1950 when the Budget Session of the East Bengal Assembly commenced, the Congress Members sought permission to move two adjournment motions to discuss the situation created at Kalshira and Nachole. But the motions were disallowed. The Congress members walked out of the Assembly in protest. This action of the Hindu members of the Assembly annoyed and enraged not only the Ministers but also the Muslim leaders and officials of the Province. This was perhaps one of the principal reasons for the Dacca and East Bengal riots in February 1950.

19. It is significant that on February 10, 1950 at about 10 o’clock in the morning, a woman was painted red to show that her breast was cut off in the Calcutta riot and was taken round the East Bengal Secretariat at Dacca. Immediately the Government servants of the Secretariat stuck work and came out in procession raising slogans of revenge against the Hindus. The procession began to swell as it passed over a distance of more than a mile. It ended in a meeting at Victoria Park at about 12 o’clock in the noon, where violent speeches against the Hindus were delivered by several speakers, including officials. The fun of the whole show was that while the employees of the Secretariat went out of the procession, the Chief Secretary of the East Bengal Government was holding a conference with his West Bengal counterpart in the same building to find out ways and means to stop communal disturbances in the two Bengals.

OFFICIALS HELPED LOOTERS

20. The riot started at about 1 p.m. simultaneously all over the city. Arson, looting of Hindu shops and houses, and killing of Hindus, wherever they were found, commenced in full swing in all parts of the city. I got evidence even from the Muslims that arson and looting were committed even in the presence of high police officials. Jewelry shops belonging to the Hindus were looted in the presence of police officers. They not only did not attempt to stop loot but also helped the looters with advice and direction. Unfortunately for me, I reached Dacca at 5 o’clock in the afternoon on the same day, in February10, 1950. To my utter dismay, I had occasion to see and know things from close quarters. What I saw and learned from firsthand information was simply staggering and heartrending.


We have tried our best to check facts. However, We are humans. Human nature is to make a mistake. So please verify facts, if you feel we are wrong. We are sorry for that. 
In case you find any mistake in our web post, then inform us. We will try to rectify it. English to Hindi translations is not in literal sense. In case of any problem, Please prefer the English version.  Please do not use social media for news. Before believing any news on social media, confirm it from any reliable source. We Tried Our best to include as many as historical facts possible but We are unable to include many things. You should use these web post only as guidance and try to Study more. 

Monday, April 9, 2018

Caste System and its Reality : जाति परंपरा और इसकी वास्तविकता (Part 1)


The Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs)

अनुसूचित जाति (एससी) और अनुसूचित जनजाति (एसटी)



The Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) are various officially designated groups of historically disadvantaged people in India. The terms are recognized in the Constitution of India and the various groups are designated in one or other of the categories. For much of the period of British rule in the Indian subcontinent, they were known as the Depressed Classes.


अनुसूचित जाति (अनुसूचित जातियों) और अनुसूचित जनजाति (एसटी) भारत में ऐतिहासिक रूप से वंचित लोगों के लिए आधिकारिक शब्द हैं। ये शब्द भारत के संविधान में मान्यता प्राप्त हैं और इन शब्दों के तहत विभिन्न समूहों को एक या अन्य श्रेणियों में नामित किया गया है। भारतीय उपमहाद्वीप में ब्रिटिश शासन की अधिकांश अवधि के लिए, उन्हें शोषित वर्ग के रूप में जाना जाता था।

Since the 1850s these communities were generally referred to as Exploited Classes, with the Schedule Caste and Scheduled Tribes also being known as Adivasi (or "original inhabitants").

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scheduled_Castes_and_Scheduled_Tribes, 22:33 PM, 07/04/2018Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) are among the most disadvantaged socio-economic groups in India.


1850 के बाद से इन समुदायों को आमतौर पर शोषित वर्ग के रूप में जाना जाता है, आदिवासी (या "मूल निवासियों") को अनुसूचित जाति और अनुसूचित जनजाति के नाम से जाना जाता है| अनुसूचित जाति और अनुसूचित जनजाति भारत के सबसे वंचित सामाजिक-आर्थिक समूहों में से हैं।Article 366 (25) defined scheduled tribes as "such tribes or tribal communities or parts of or groups within such tribes or tribal communities as are deemed under Article 342 to be Scheduled Tribes for the purposes of this constitution". Article 342, which is reproduced below, prescribes the procedure to be followed in the matter of specification of scheduled tribe.

अनुच्छेद 366 (25), अनुच्छेद 342 में अनुसूचित जनजातियों को परिभाषित किया गया है।http://vikaspedia.in/social-welfare/scheduled-tribes-welfare/ministry-of-tribal-welfareMust read for Article 342.Article 342 provides for specification of tribes or tribal communities or parts of or groups within tribes or tribal communities which are deemed to be for the purposes of the Constitution the Scheduled Tribes in relation to that State or Union Territory. In pursuance of these provisions, the list of Scheduled Tribes are notified for each State or Union Territory and are valid only within the jurisdiction of that State or Union Territory and not outside.

No suitable translation is available.

कोई उपयुक्त अनुवाद उपलब्ध नहीं है।

Scheduled castes are those castes/races in the country that suffer from extreme social, educational and economic backwardness arising out of age-old practice of untouchability and certain others on account of lack of infrastructure facilities and geographical isolation, and who need special consideration for safeguarding their interests and for their accelerated socio-economic development. These communities were notified as Scheduled Castes as per provisions contained in Clause 1 of Article 341 of the Constitution.

अनुसूचित जाति वह देश में जातियां हैं जो अस्पृश्यता की पुरानी परंपरा से उत्पन्न होने वाली अत्यधिक सामाजिक, शैक्षिक और आर्थिक पिछड़ेपन से ग्रस्त हैं। अनुसूचित जाति वह जातियां हैं जिनके हितों की सुरक्षा के लिए और त्वरित सामाजिक-आर्थिक विकास के लिए विशेष विचार की आवश्यकता है। इन समुदायों को संविधान के अनुच्छेद 341 के खंड 1 में निहित प्रावधानों के अनुसार अनुसूचित जाति के रूप में अधिसूचित किया गया था।


https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/how-supreme-court-viewed-words-hindu-hinduism-hindutva-in-rulings/articleshow/62782807.cms How Supreme Court viewed words ‘Hindu’, ‘Hinduism’ & ‘Hindutva’ in rulings Must Read Any person, who follows culturally or religiously to aspects of Hinduism, can be called as Hindu. Historically it has been used as a geographical, cultural, and later religious identification for people of the Indian subcontinent.
The historical meaning of the term Hindu has evolved with time. Starting with the Persian and Greek references to the land of the Indus in the 1st millennium BCE through the texts of the medieval era, the term Hindu implied a geographic, ethnic or cultural identifier for people living in the Indian subcontinent around or beyond the Sindhu (Indus) river. By the 16th century, the term began to refer to residents of the subcontinent who were not Turkic or Muslims.
Borrowing from Latin Indus, from Ancient Greek Ἰνδός (Indós), from Old Persian(hiⁿduš), from Proto-Iranian *hindu- (compare Avestan ‎ (hiṇdu-)), from Proto-Indo-Iranian *sindʰus or borrowed from Sanskrit सिन्धु (síndhu).
किसी भी व्यक्ति, जो हिंदू धर्म के सांस्कृतिक या धार्मिक पहलुओं का पालन करता है, को हिंदू कहा जा सकता है। ऐतिहासिक रूप से यह शब्द भारतीय उपमहाद्वीप के लोगों की भौगोलिक, सांस्कृतिक, पहचान के रूप में उपयोग किया गया है।
हिंदू शब्द का ऐतिहासिक अर्थ समय के साथ विकसित हुआ है। 1 सहस्त्राब्दी बीसीई में, फारसी और यूनानी ने सिंधु की भूमि के लिए इस शब्द का इस्तेमाल किया|मध्ययुगीन युग के ग्रंथों ने हिन्दू को भारतीय उपमहाद्वीप में सिंधु (इंडस) नदी के पार या उससे आगे रहने वाले लोगों के लिए पहचान के रूप में परिभाषित किया।16 वीं शताब्दी से, इस शब्द का इस्तेमाल उपमहाद्वीप के निवासियों के लिए करना शुरू हुआ, जो तुर्क या मुस्लिम नहीं थे।
Dr. Ambedkar viewed the Shudras as Aryas and rejected the Aryan invasion theory. Dr.  Ambedkar described it as absurd. He had said in his book "Who Were the Shudras?" (1946). Aryan invasion theory should have been dead long ago .
डॉ अंबेडकर ने शूद्रों को आर्य के रूप में देखा और आर्यन आक्रमण सिद्धांत को खारिज कर दिया। डॉ अंबेडकर ने इसे बेतुका बताया। उन्होंने अपनी पुस्तक "हू वेर द शूद्र्स?" में कहा था (1946)| आर्यन आक्रमण सिद्धांत बहुत पहले ही मृत होना चाहिए था।
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aryan_invasion_theory  (This Theory is dead by now. Please Don’t believe in it. ) Theories postulating prehistoric Indo-Aryan migrations:
Mortimer Wheeler's theory that Indo-Aryan invaders overthrew the Indus Valley Civilization; refuted by many archeologists after new excavations at Harappan sites.
Indo-Aryan migration theory, that the Indo-Aryans migrated into the Indian subcontinent
Indigenous Aryans theory, that the Indo-Aryans originated within the Indian subcontinent, but rejected by most linguists.
A series of lectures on the Aryan issue - PART 01 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RT4pUJMDV2Y)
A series of lectures on the Aryan issue - PART 02
A series of lectures on the Aryan issue - PART 03
A series of lectures on the Aryan issue - PART 04
A series of lectures on the Aryan issue - PART 05
Meluhha: the Indus Civilization and Its Contacts with Mesopotamia
Science in Ancient India: Sanskrit-based Knowledge Systems" by Prof. Michel Danino-IITR (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vfofx7piJDk)
Guest Lecture by Dr. R N Iyengar on 'Natural Sciences and Astronomy in Ancient India'(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3MMmgjDmww4)
Michel Danino: 12 Great achievements of Indian Civilization(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmogKGCmclE)
A lecture at IIT Gandhinagar on 6 September 2016
India ki Khoj Talk by Michel Danino (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FpzF_ukaojI) 
Lecture-01_Recent Findings on Indus-Sarasvati Civilization- IIT Kanpur
Lecture-02-The Aryan Controversy- IIT Kanpur(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FL6nxDn3cmE&t=690s)
Lecture-03- Recent Findings on the Ganga-Vindhya Civilization-IIT Kanpur
Lecture-04-Sacred Geography and the Making of India- IIT Kanpur
Lecture-05- India’s Interface with the Western World-IIT Kanpur
Lecture-06-India’s Interface with the Eastern World- IIT Kanpur
Lecture-07-Ancient Indian Architecture and Sacred Geometry- IIT Kanpur
Lecture-08- Ayodhya through the Ages and the Temple Controversy-IIT Kanpur(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vbCsG9dsVtI)
Lecture-09- Indian Education in Principle and Practice-IIT Kanpur
Lecture-11- Water Management in Ancient India-IIT Kanpur
Lecture-12- Highlights of Science in Ancient India – Part 1-IIT Kanpur
Lecture-13- Highlights of Science in Ancient India – Part 2-IIT Kanpur
Lecture-14-Indian Ethics and Values- IIT Kanpur(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XO7AbUuW2Po)
Guest lecture by Prof.H.C.Verma on "Surgery practices in India from ancient times"(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MSszQDh3CLk)

Manusmriti : Dharmaśāstr, Historical Debate, British colonial law??मनुस्मृति: धर्मशास्त्र, ऐतिहासिक बहस, ब्रिटिश औपनिवेशिक कानून??


Mahabharat Episode -27- (10:00 min-30:00 min.), Yudhishthir become prince. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bb-lH-pikR8)Time: 10:00 min-30:00 min.
Hindu society, caste, and gender (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-rU3thF6bE&t=32s) by Dr Nick Sutton of the Oxford Centre for Hindu Studies.
Units of time,  समय की इकाइयां
14 Manvantara = 1000 Mahā-Yugas = 1 Kalpa = 1 day (day only) of Brahma. (2 Kalpas constitute a day and night of Brahma). Satya Yuga + Treta Yuga+ Dvapara Yuga + Kali Yuga = 1 Mahā-Yuga (4.32 million solar years). A Manvantara consists of 71 Mahā-Yuga (306,720,000 solar years). Each Manvantara is ruled by a Manu. Brahma lives for 100 Brahma years. We are currently in the first 'day' of the 51st year of our Brahma. This Brahma's day, Kalpa is named as Shveta-Varaha Kalpa. Within this Day, six Manvantaras have already elapsed and this is the seventh Manvantara, named as – Vaivasvatha Manvantara.
14 मन्वन्तर =1000 महायुग= 1 कल्प = ब्रह्मा का 1 दिवस (केवल दिन) ( दो कल्प ब्रह्मा के एक दिन और रात बनाते हैं)| एक मन्वन्तर में 71 महायुग (306,720,000 सौर वर्ष) होते हैं| प्रत्येक मन्वन्तर के शासक एक मनु होते है|एक महायुग (43 लाख 20 हजार सौर वर्ष) =सत युग+त्रेता युग+द्वापर युग+कलि युग|ब्रह्मा की आयु १०० वर्ष ह है फिर ब्रह्मा मर जाते है और दूसरा देवता ब्रह्मा का स्थान ग्रहण करते हैं|आप वर्तमान ब्रह्मा के इक्यावनवें वर्ष में सातवें मनु, वैवस्वत मनु के शासन में सॄजित हुए हैं।
Who is Manu? What is Manu?  मनु कौन है? मनु क्या है? 
Generally speaking, A kalpa is the period of time between the creation and recreation of a world or universe. 1 kalpa = 4.32 billion years.
In some Puranic mythology, each kalpa consists of fourteen Manvantaras, and each Manvantara is headed by a different Manu. The current universe, in this mythology, is asserted to be ruled by the 7th Manu named Vaivasvata. The Sanskrit term for 'human', मानव (IAST: mānava) means 'of Manu' or 'children of Manu'.
वर्तमान में वैवस्वत मनु (7वें मनु) हैं।आम तौर पर, एक कल्प एक विश्व या ब्रह्मांड के निर्माण और पुन: निर्माण के बीच का समय है 1 कल्प = 4.32 अरब साल।
मानव का हिन्दी में अर्थ है वह जिसमें मन, जड़ और प्राण से कहीं अधिक सक्रिय है। मनुष्य में मन की शक्ति है, विचार करने की शक्ति है, इसीलिए उसे मनुष्य कहते हैं। सभी मनुष्य, मनु की संतानें हैं इसीलिए मनुष्य को मानव भी कहा जाता है|
In Hindu religion, it is said all other Manus comes from the family of Svayambhuva Manu. Mahabharat gives name of 8 manus only. Jain religious scriptures and Shveta-VarahaKalpa told us about 14 Manus.
Name of 14 Manus are:
Svayambhuva Manu, Svarocisha Manu, Uttama Manu, Tapasa Manu, Raivata Manu, Cakshusha Manu, Vaivasvata Manu, Savarni Manu, Daksha-savarni Manu, Brahma-savarni Manu, Dharma-savarni Manu, Rudra-savarni Manu, Deva-savarni Manu, Indra-savarni Manu.
हिंदू धर्म में स्वायंभुव मनु के ही कुल में आगे चलकर स्वायंभुव सहित कुल मिलाकर क्रमश: १४ मनु हुए। महाभारत में ८ मनुओं का उल्लेख मिलता है व श्वेतवराह में १४ मनुओं का उल्लेख है। जैन ग्रन्थों में १४ कुलकरों का वर्णन मिलता है।
चौदह मनुओं के नाम इस प्रकार से हैं:
स्वायम्भु मनु , स्वरोचिष मनु, औत्तमी मनु, तामस मनु, रैवत मनु, चाक्षुष मनु, वैवस्वत मनु या श्राद्धदेव मनु, सावर्णि मनु, दक्ष सावर्णि मनु, ब्रह्म सावर्णि मनु, धर्म सावर्णि मनु, रुद्र सावर्णि मनु, देव सावर्णि मनु या रौच्य मनु, इन्द्र सावर्णि मनु या भौत मनु|
So Manu is the name of post which was/is/will be held by different mythological men of different kalpas.It is not name of any man.
Manusmriti And Manu : Unresolved Debate (मनुस्मृति और मनु: अनसुलझी धार्मिक बहस)
In Shatpath Brahmin, Vaivasvata Manu and Shardha is considered as progenitors of humanity. He was considered as the king of earth that has seven continents. He is considered as presenter of Manusmriti. But his original creation was lost with time. No original copy is available today. Some people say that in his original copy “Varana” means color, not caste. However, it can not be verified that such text even existed. 
शतपथ ब्राह्मण में मनु को श्रद्धादेव कहकर संबोधित किया गया है। श्रीमद्भागवत में इन्हीं वैवस्वत मनु और श्रद्धा से मानवीय सृष्टि का प्रारंभ माना गया है। महाराज मनु ने बहुत दिनों तक इस सप्तद्वीपवती पृथ्वी पर राज्य किया। उनके राज्य में प्रजा बहुत सुखी थी। इन्हीं ने मनुस्मृति नामक ग्रन्थ की रचना की थी जो आज मूल रूप में उपलब्ध नहीं है। उसके अर्थ का अनर्थ ही होता रहा है। उस काल में वर्ण का अर्थ रंग होता था और आज जाति।
https://hi.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%A4%AE%E0%A4%A8%E0%A5%81
According to some people, The title of the text Manusmriti uses this term as a prefix, but refers to the first Manu – Svayambhuva, the spiritual son of Brahma.
Roshen Dalal (2010). The Religions of India: A Concise Guide to Nine Major Faiths. Penguin Books. 
The problem in this logic: Universe/Kalpa of first Svayambhuv Manu is different,  Many religious teachers may not agree with this. 
In Vishnu Purana, Vaivasvata Manu, Satyavrata, was the king of Dravida before the great flood. He was warned of the flood by the Matsya (fish) avatar of Vishnu. He built a boat that carried the Vedas, Manu's family and the seven sages to safety. This myth is similar to other flood myths such as that of Gilgamesh (an Akkadian poem that is considered the first great work of literature, and in earlier Sumerian poems. ) and Bible.
Alain Daniélou (11 February 2003). A Brief History of India. Inner Traditions / Bear & Co. pp. 19
कुछ लोगों का मानना है कि पहले मनु (स्वायंभुव मनु) मनुस्मृति के प्रस्तुतकर्ता है|
इस तर्क में समस्या: पहले मनु (स्वायंभुव मनु) का कल्प अलग है, कई धार्मिक शिक्षक इस बात से सहमत नहीं हैं।
विष्णु पुराण में; द्रविड़ राजा वैवस्वत मनु, महान बाढ़ से पहले सप्तद्वीपवती पृथ्वी का राजा था।
उन्हें विष्णु के मत्स्य (मछली) अवतार द्वारा बाढ़ की चेतावनी दी गई। उन्होंने एक नाव बनाया जिसमें वेद, मनु के परिवार और सात ऋषियों की सुरक्षा थी। यह मिथक गल्गामेश और बाइबिल जैसे अन्य बाढ़ के मिथकों के समान है|
Manusmriti : Historical Debate, मनुस्मृति: ऐतिहासिक बहस
The Manusmṛti (or "Laws of Manu", Sanskrit Manusmṛti मनुस्मृति; also known as Mānava-Dharmaśāstra मानवधर्मशास्त्र) is the important and earliest metrical work of the Dharmaśāstra (धर्मशास्त्र) textual tradition of Hinduism.
There are many Dharmashastras, variously estimated to be 18 to about 100, with different and conflicting points of view.
Pandurang Vaman Kane mentions over 100 different Dharmasastra texts were known by the Middle Ages in India, but most of these are lost to history and their existence is inferred from quotes and citations in bhasya and digests that have survived. John Bowker (2012), The Message and the Book: Sacred Texts of the World's Religions, Yale University Press.
मनुस्मृति ("मनु का कानून") हिंदू धर्म की धर्मशास्त्र शास्त्रीय परंपरा का महत्वपूर्ण और प्रारंभिक कार्य है।मनुस्मृति के बहुत से संस्करण उपलब्ध हैं। कालान्तर में बहुत से प्रक्षेप भी स्वाभाविक हैं। 
कई धर्मशास्त्र हैं| उनकी संख्या का अनुमान 18 से 100 के बीच है|उनका दृष्टिकोण विरोधाभासी है|
पांडुरंग वामन काणे, सामाजिक सुधार को समर्पित एक महान विद्वान्, ने इस पुरानी परंपरा को जारी रखा है। उनका धर्मशास्त्र का इतिहास, पाँच भागों में प्रकाशित है, प्राचीन भारत के सामाजिक विधियों तथा प्रथाओं का विश्वकोश है। इससे हमें प्राचीन भारत में सामाजिक प्रक्रिया को समझने में मदद मिलती है।"
About 20 Dharmasutras are known, some surviving into the modern era just as fragments of their original. Four Dharmasūtras have been translated into English, and most remain in manuscripts. All carry the names of their authors, but it is still difficult to determine who these real authors were. The most important of these texts are the sutras of Apastamba, Gautama, Baudhayana, and Vasistha. There is uncertainty regarding the dates of these documents due to lack of evidence concerning these documents. here is confusion regarding the geographical provenance of these documents.
The extant Dharmasutras are written in concise sutra format, with a very terse incomplete sentence structure which are difficult to understand and leave much to the reader to interpret. The Dharmasastras are derivative works on the Dharmasutras, using a shloka (four 8-syllable verse style chandas poetry, Anushtubh meter), which are relatively clearer.
आधुनिक युग में लगभग 20 धर्मशास्त्र ज्ञात हैं|आधुनिक युग में उनके मूल पाठ के छोटे टुकड़े हमें ज्ञात हैं|चार का अंग्रेजी में अनुवाद किया गया है, और अन्य का अभी तक अनुवाद नहीं किया गया है।हालांकि सभी अपने लेखकों के नाम लेते हैं, लेकिन यह निर्धारित करना अभी भी कठिन है कि ये वास्तविक लेखक कौन थे।इनमें से सबसे महत्वपूर्ण में अपास्तम्ब, गौतम, बौद्ध्यन और वसिष्ठ के सूत्र है।
साक्ष्यों की कमी के कारण; इन दस्तावेजों की तारीखों के बारे में अनिश्चितता है इन दस्तावेजों की भौगोलिक स्थिति के बारे में भ्रम है।
The extant Dharmasutras are written in concise sutra format, with a very terse incomplete sentence structure which are difficult to understand and leave much to the reader to interpret. That’s why some people misused them. The Dharmasastras are derivative works on the Dharmasutras, using a shloka (four 8-syllable verse style chandas poetry, Anushtubh meter), which are relatively clearer.
धर्मसुत्र संक्षिप्त सूत्र प्रारूप में लिखे गए हैं। इसकी संक्षिप्त वाक्य संरचनाओं को समझना मुश्किल है। पाठक, उनकी व्याख्या, अपनी मानसिकता के अनुसार कर सकते हैं|यह पाठक की व्याख्या के लिए खुला है (उसकी पसंद के अनुसार)।यही कारण है कि कुछ लोगों ने इसका दुरुपयोग किया।धर्मशास्त्र (मनुस्मृति, यज्ञवल्क्य स्मृती आदि) धर्मसुत्रों के व्युत्पन्न लेखन हैं|धर्मशास्त्र श्लोक शैली का उपयोग करते है।
The word Dharmaśāstras never appears in the Vedic texts, and the word śāstra itself appears for the first time in Yaska's Nirukta text. Katyayana's commentary on Panini's work (~3rd century BCE), has the oldest known single mention of the word Dharmaśāstras. The extant Dharmaśāstras texts are listed below:
The Manusmriti (~ 2nd to 3rd century CE), The Yājñavalkya Smṛti (~ 4th to 5th-century CE) The Nāradasmṛti (~ 5th to 6th-century CE),  Viṣṇusmṛti (~ 7th-century CE). Evidence suggests that Yajnavalkya Smriti, state Ghose and other scholars, was the more referred to text than Manu Smriti, in matters of governance and practice. This text, of unclear date of composition, but likely to be a few centuries after Manusmriti, is more "concise, methodical, distilled and liberal".
Patrick Olivelle (2005), Manu's Code of Law, Oxford University Press.
Timothy Lubin, Donald R. Davis Jr & Jayanth K. Krishnan 2010, p. 57.
M Rama Jois (2004), Legal and Constitutional History of India, Universal Law Publishing, page 31
शब्द “धर्मशास्त्र” वेदों में मौजूद नहीं है। शब्द “धर्मशास्त्र” Yaska's Nirukta में पहली बार आता है।पाणिनी के कार्य (3 शताब्दी ईसा पूर्व) पर कैत्यायान की टिप्पणी, में “धर्मशास्त्र” शब्द का सबसे पुराना ज्ञात उल्लेख है।मौजूदा धर्मशास्त्र नीचे सूचीबद्ध हैं:मनुस्मृति (2-3शताब्दी), यज्ञवल्क्य स्मृति (4-5 शताब्दी), नारद स्मृति(5-6 शताब्दी), विष्णु स्मृति (700 AD). साक्ष्य से पता चलता है कि शासन के मामले में यज्ञवल्क्य स्मृति, राज्य घोष और अन्य विद्वानों की स्मृतियां, मनुस्मृति की तुलना में ज्यादा इस्तेमाल की जाती थीं। मनुस्मृति के मुकाबले ये स्मृतियां अधिक "संक्षिप्त, व्यवस्थित, परिष्कृत और उदार" हैं|
Time of compilation of manusmriti (MS) is not clear. Many scholars have  debated on this subjects. Some says there are texts before manusmriti, some man in past used them to create MS. Many quotations of manusmriti can not be found in texts like Mahabharata. However Quotations of Manu (present in other religious scriptures)  may be found in MS. This assumption that present form of MS is a more a commentary than law , seems to be true. 
मनुस्मृति के काल एवं प्रणेता के विषय में नवीन अनुसंधानकारी विद्वानों ने पर्याप्त विचार किया है। उनमे से कुछ कहते हैं कि मनुस्मृति से पहले कोई 'मानव धर्मसूत्र' था,  जिसका आश्रय लेकर किसी ने एक मूल मनुस्मृति बनाई थी| जो बाद में बिगड़ कर होकर वर्तमान रूप में प्रचलित हो गई। मनुस्मृति के अनेक विचार या वाक्य, महाभारत आदि प्राचीन ग्रंथों में नहीं मिलते हैं| यह अनुमान बहुत कुछ तर्कसंगत प्रतीत होता है कि  धर्मशास्त्र के नाम से
विषय परक वाक्य समाज में प्रचलित थे, जिनका निर्देश महाभारत आदि में है तथा जिन वचनों का आश्रय लेकर वर्तमान मनुसंहिता बनाई गई|
The Sanskrit text was edited in 1913 by P. H. Pandya and in 1920 by J.R. Gharpure. The text was first translated into English (from manuscripts) in 1794 by Sir William Jones. The text's fame spread outside India, long before the colonial era. The medieval era Buddhistic law of Myanmar and Thailand are also ascribed to Manu, and the text influenced past Hindu kingdoms in Cambodia and Indonesia.
Steven Collins (1993), The discourse of what is primary, Journal of Indian philosophy, Volume 21, pages 301-393.
Robert Lingat (1973), The Classical Law of India, University of California Press, ISBN 978-0520018983, page 77.
Patrick Olivelle (2005), Manu's Code of Law, Oxford University Press.
Scholars doubt Manusmriti was ever administered as law text in ancient or medieval Hindu society. David Buxbaum states, "in the opinion of the best contemporary orientalists, it [Manusmriti] does not, as a whole, represent a set of rules ever actually administered in Hindustan. It is in great part an ideal picture of that which, in the view of a Brahmin, ought to be law". David Buxbaum (1998), Family Law and Customary Law in Asia: A Contemporary Legal Perspective, Springer Academic.
विलियम जोन्स द्वारा 1794 में मनुस्मृति का प्रथम अंग्रेजी (पांडुलिपियों से) अनुवाद किया गया था।इसकी प्रसिद्धि भारत के बाहर, औपनिवेशिक युग से बहुत पहले फैल गई थी।म्यांमार और थाईलैंड के मध्यकालीन युग बौद्ध के कुछ कानून भी मनुस्मृति पर आधारित हैं।मनुस्मृति ने कंबोडिया और इंडोनेशिया में पिछले हिंदू साम्राज्यों को प्रभावित किया।विद्वानों को शक है कि मनुस्मृति प्राचीन या मध्ययुगीन हिंदू समाज में कानून में प्रयोग नहीं किया गया था।डेविड बक्सबौम कहते हैं, "सर्वश्रेष्ठ समकालीन प्राच्यवादियों की राय में, वास्तव में मनुस्मृति पूरी तरह से, हिन्दूस्तान में नैतिक और कानूनी नियमों का प्रतिनिधित्व नहीं करता है।” 
Donald Davis writes, "there is no historical evidence for either an active propagation or implementation of Dharmasastra [Manusmriti] by a ruler or any state – as distinct from other forms of recognizing, respecting and using the text. Thinking of Dharmasastra as a legal code and of its authors as lawgivers is thus a serious misunderstanding of its history". Other scholars have expressed the same view, based on epigraphical, archeological and textual evidence from medieval Hindu kingdoms in Gujarat, Kerala and Tamil Nadu, while acknowledging that Manusmriti was influential to the South Asian history of law and was a theoretical resource.
डोनाल्ड डेविस लिखते हैं, "एक शासक या किसी भी राज्य द्वारा धर्मशास्त्र के सक्रिय प्रचार या कार्यान्वयन के लिए कोई ऐतिहासिक सबूत नहीं है|धर्मशास्त्र को कानून की संहिता मानना और इसके लेखकों को कानून विद मानना, एक गंभीर एतिहासिक गलती है|शिलालेखों, पुरातात्विक प्रमाणों के आधार पर  दूसरे एतिहासकारो का भी यही मानना है|  
Donald Davis (2010), The Spirit of Hindu Law, Cambridge University Press.  Werner Menski (2009), Hindu Law: Beyond Tradition and Modernity, Oxford University Press.  Donald R Davis Jr (2005), Intermediate Realms of Law: Corporate Groups and Rulers in Medieval India, Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient, Volume 48, Issue 1, pages 92–117.

Prior to the British colonial rule, Sharia (Islamic law) for Muslims in South Asia had been codified as Fatawa-e-Alamgiri, but laws for non-Muslims – such as Hindus, Buddhists, Sikhs, Jains, Parsis – were not codified during the 600 years of Islamic rule. With the arrival of the British colonial officials, Manusmriti played a historic role in constructing a legal system for non-Muslims in South Asia and early Western perceptions about the ancient and medieval Indian society.
ब्रिटिश औपनिवेशिक शासन से पहले, दक्षिण एशिया में मुसलमानों के लिए शरिया (इस्लामी कानून) को फतवा-ए-आलमगिरी में संहिताबद्ध किया गया था| लेकिन गैर-मुसलमानों (जैसे हिंदू, बौद्ध, सिख, जैन, पारसी) के लिए कानून - इस्लामी शासन के 600 वर्षों के दौरान संहिताबद्ध नहीं किये थे|ब्रिटिश औपनिवेशिक अधिकारियों के आगमन के साथ, मनुस्मृति ने दक्षिण एशिया में गैर-मुस्लिमों के लिए एक कानूनी प्रणाली का निर्माण करने में भूमिका निभाई|  Lariviere, Richard W. (November 1989). "Justices and Paṇḍitas: Some Ironies in Contemporary Readings of the Hindu Legal Past". Journal of Asian Studies. Association for Asian Studies. 48 (4): 757–769. 
The East India Company, and later the British Crown, sought profits for its British shareholders through trade as well as sought to maintain effective political control with minimal military engagement. The administration pursued a path of least resistance, relying upon co-opted local intermediaries that were mostly Muslims and some Hindus in various princely states. The British exercised power by avoiding interference and adapting to law practices as explained by the local intermediaries. The existing legal texts for Muslims, and resurrected Manusmriti manuscript thus helped the colonial state sustain the pre-colonial religious and political law and conflicts, well into the late nineteenth century.
Washbrook, D. A. (1981). "Law, State and Agrarian Society in Colonial India". Modern Asian Studies. 15 (3): 649–721.Tomothy Lubin et al (2010), Hinduism and Law: An Introduction (Editors: Lubin and Davis), Cambridge University Press.Ludo Rocher (1978), Hindu Conceptions of Law, Hastings Law Journal, Volume 29, pages 1283-1297.
ईस्ट इंडिया कंपनी और बाद में ब्रिटिश क्राउन, अपने ब्रिटिश शेयरधारकों के लिए व्यापार के जरिए मुनाफा कमाना चाहते थे। वे न्यूनतम सैन्य हस्तक्षेप के साथ प्रभावी राजनीतिक नियंत्रण बनाए रखना चाहते थे।प्रशासन ने कम से कम प्रतिरोध का रास्ता अपनाया ब्रिटिश प्रशासन विभिन्न रियासतों में स्थानीय मध्यस्थों पर निर्भर थे। उनमें से ज्यादातर मुसलमान और कुछ हिंदू थे। ब्रिटिश शासन ने प्रतिरोध को कम करने के लिये इन के द्वारा सुझाये गये रास्तो का पालन करने की कोशिश की|
मुसलमानों के लिए मौजूदा कानूनी ग्रंथों और मनुस्मृति पांडुलिपि को पुनर्जीवित करने से औपनिवेशिक राज्य में धार्मिक और राजनीतिक संघर्षों को बनाए रखने में मददमिली| फूट डालो और शासन करो|
For Muslims of India, the British accepted sharia as the legal code for Muslims, based on texts such the al-Sirjjiyah and Fatawa-i Alamgiri written under sponsorship of Aurangzeb. For Hindus and other non-Muslims such as Buddhists, Sikhs, Jains, Parsis and Tribal people, this information was unavailable. The substance of Hindu law, was derived by the British colonial officials from Manusmriti, and it became the first Dharmasastra that was translated in 1794. The British colonial officials, for practice, attempted to extract from the Dharmaśāstra, the English categories of law and religion for the purposes of colonial administration.
The British colonial officials, however, mistook the Manusmriti as codes of law, failed to recognize that it was a commentary on morals and law and not a statement of positive law. The colonial officials of the early 19th century also failed to recognize that Manusmriti was one of many competing Dharmasastra texts, it was not in use for centuries during the Islamic rule period of India.
भारत के मुसलमानों के लिए, अंग्रेजों ने कानूनी कोड के रूप में शरिया को स्वीकार किया|शरिया के नियम अल-दीरियाह और फतवा-ए आलमगिरी पर आधारित थे, जिन्हें औरंगजेब ने  लिखवाया था। हिन्दू और अन्य गैर-मुस्लिम जैसे बौद्ध, सिख, जैन, पारसी और आदिवासी लोगों के लिए, इस प्रकार की कानूनी जानकारी उपलब्ध नहीं थी। ब्रिटिश औपनिवेशिक अधिकारियों द्वारा लगभग मृत और बेकार मनुस्मृति से हिंदू कानून के तत्वों की खोज की गई थी|।यह पहला धर्मशास्त्र था, जिसका अनुवाद 17 9 4 में हुआ था।
Michael Anderson (1995), Institutions and Ideologies: A SOAS South Asia Reader (Studies in Asian Topics, Editors: David Arnold, Peter Robb), Routledge, ISBN 978-0700702848, Chapter 10;
K Ewing (1988), Sharia and ambiguity in South Asian Islam, University of California Press, ISBN 978-0520055759
The British colonial officials, for practice, attempted to extract from the Dharmaśāstra, the English categories of law and religion for the purposes of colonial administration.
As per modern scholars, The British colonial officials, however, mistook the Manusmriti as codes of law, failed to recognize that it was a commentary on morals and law and not a statement of positive law. The colonial officials of the early 19th century also failed to recognize that Manusmriti was one of many competing Dharmasastra texts, it was not in use for centuries during the history of India.
ब्रिटिश औपनिवेशिक अधिकारियों ने धर्मशास्र से ब्रिटिश कानून और धर्म के समान कानूनी व्यवस्था निकालने का प्रयास किया। ताकि वे इस कॉलोनी पर शासन कर सकें|
आधुनिक विद्वानों के अनुसार, ब्रिटिश औपनिवेशिक अधिकारियों ने गलती से मनुस्मृति को कानून के कोड के रूप में समझ लिया।
वे यह मानने में नाकाम रहे कि मनुस्मृति नैतिकता और कानून पर टिप्पणी थी, नाकि एक कानूनी प्रणाली|19वीं शताब्दी के शुरुआती औपनिवेशिक अधिकारियों वे यह समझने में नाकाम रहे कि मनुस्मृति कई धर्मशास्त्र ग्रंथों में से एक था| जिन में कई विषयों पर परस्पर विरोधी विचार हैं| जिन में कई, भारत के इतिहास के दौरान शताब्दियों से  प्रयोग में नहीं थे।
Michael Anderson (1995), Institutions and Ideologies: A SOAS South Asia Reader (Studies in Asian Topics, Editors: David Arnold, Peter Robb), Routledge, ISBN 978-0700702848, Chapter 10;
K Ewing (1988), Sharia and ambiguity in South Asian Islam, University of California Press, ISBN 978-0520055759


More about Manu:



Hindu texts describe units of Kala measurements, from microseconds to Trillions of years. According to these texts, time is cyclic, which repeats itself forever.


Taken from https://archive.is/Mri30#selection-281.0-281.14, 
https://archive.is/6b9af#selection-69.0-73.49 good site Must watch. A Non-profit Service by Khapre Family since 1997. I am thankful to this family. 

ब्रह्मा का एक दिन बराबर है:
(14 गुणा 71 महायुग) + (15 x 4 चरण)
= 994 महायुग + (60 चरण)
= 994 महायुग + (6 x 10) चरण
= 994 महायुग + 6 महायुग
= 1,000 महायुग
एक मन्वन्तर में 71 महायुग (306,720,000 सौर वर्ष) होते हैं. प्रत्येक मन्वन्तर के शासक एक मनु होते हैं|
 हर एक मन्वन्तर का राजा मनु होता है, एवं उसकी सहायता के लिए सप्तर्षि, देवतागण,इन्द्र, अवतार एवं मनुपुत्र रहते हैं । इनमें सप्तर्षियों का कार्य प्रजा उत्पन्न करना रहता है, एवं इन प्रजाओं का पालन मनु एवं उसके पुत्र भूपाल बन कर करते हैं । इन भूपालों को देवतागण सलाह देने का कार्य करते है, एवं भूपालों को प्राप्त होनेवाली अडचनों का निवारण इन्द्र करता है । जिस समय इन्द्र हतबल होता है, उस समय स्वयं विष्णु अवतार लेकर भृपालोम का कष्ट निवारण करता है । मनु एवं उसके उपर्युक्त सारे सहायकगण विष्णु के अंशरुप माने गये है, तथा मन्वंन्तर के अन्त में वे सारे विष्णु में ही विलीन हो जाते हैं । किसी भी मन्वन्तर के आरम्भ में वे विष्णु के ही अंश से उत्पन्न होते हैं [विष्णु.१.३] । 
n.  मनवसृष्टि का प्रवर्तक आदिपुरुष, जो समस्त मानवजाति का पिता माना जाता है [ऋ.१.८०.१६,११४.२, २.३३.१३, ८.६३.१];[ अ. वे.१४.२.४१];[ तै. सं.२.१.५.६] । कई अभ्यासकों के अनुसार मनु वैवस्वत तथा यह दोनों एक ही व्यक्ति थे (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manu_(Hinduism)) । ऋग्वेद में प्रायः बीस बार मनु का निर्देश व्यक्तिवाचक नाम से किया गया है । वहॉं सर्वत इसे ‘आदिपुरुष’ एवं मानव जाति का पिता, तथा यज्ञ एवं तत्संबंधित विषयों का मार्गदर्शक माना गया है । मनु के द्वारा बताये गये मार्ग से ले जाने की प्रार्थना वेदों में प्राप्त है [ऋ.८.३०.१] । 
मानवजाति का पिता n.  ऋग्वेद में पांच बार इसे पिता एवं दो बार निश्चित रुप से ‘हमारे पिता’ कहा गया है [ऋ.२.३३] । तैत्तिरीय संहिता में मानवजाति को ‘मनु की प्रजा’ (मानव्यःप्रजाः) कहा गया है [तै. सं. १.५.१.३] । वैदिक साहित्य में मनु को विवस्वत् का पुत्र माना गया है, एवं इसे ‘वैवस्वत’ पैतृक नाम दिया गया है [अ.वे.८.१०];[ श.ब्रा.१३.४.३] । यास्क के अनुसार, विवस्वत् का अर्थ सूर्य होता है, इस प्रकार यह आदिपुरुष सूर्य का पुत्र था [नि.१२.१०] । यास्क इसे सामान्य व्यक्ति न मानकर दिव्यक्षेत्र का दिव्य प्राणी मानते है [नि.१२.३४] । वैदिक साहित्य में यम को भी विवस्वत् का पुत्र माना गया है, एवं कई स्थानो पर उसे भी मरणशील मनुष्यों में प्रथम माना गया है । इससे प्रतीत होता है कि, वैदिक काल के प्रारम्भ में मनु एवं यम का अस्तित्व अभिन्न था, किन्तु उत्तरकालीन वैदिक साहित्य में मनु को जीवित मनुष्यों का एवं यम को दूसरे लोक में मृत मनुष्यों का आदिपुरुष माना गया । इसीलिए शतपथ ब्राह्मण में मनु वैवस्वत को मनुष्यों के शासक के रुप में, तथ यम वैवस्वत को मृत पितरों के शासक के रुप मे वर्णन किया गया है [ऋ.८.५२.१];[ श.ब्रा.१३.४.३] । यह मनु सम्भवतः केवल आर्यो के ही पूर्वज के रुप में माना गया है, क्योंकि अनेक स्थलों पर इसका अनार्यो के पूर्वज द्यौः से विभेद किया है । 
यज्ञसंस्था का आरंभकर्ता n.  -मनु ही यज्ञप्रभा का आरंभकर्ता था, इसीसे इसे विश्व का प्रथम यज्ञकर्ता माना जाता है [ऋ.१०.६३.७];[ तै. सं.१.५.१.३,२.५.९.१,६.७.१,३.३.२.१,५.४.१०.५,६.६.६.१,७.५.१५.३] । ऋग्वेद के अनुसार, विश्व में अग्नि प्रज्वलित करने के बाद सात पुरोहितों के साथ इसने ही सर्वप्रथम देवों को हवि समर्पित की थी [ऋ.१०.६३] । 
यज्ञ से ऐश्वर्यप्राप्ति n.  तैत्तिरीय संहिता में मनु के द्वारा किये गये यज्ञ के उपरांत उसके ऐश्वर्य के प्राप्त होने की कथा प्राप्त है । देव-दैत्यों के बीच चल रहे युद्ध की विभीषिका से अपने धन की सुरक्षा करने के लिए देवों ने उसे अग्नि को दे दिया । बाद को अग्नि के हृदय में लोभ उत्पन्न हुआ, एवं वह देवों के समस्त धनसम्पत्ति को लेकर भागने लगा । देवों ने उसका पीछा किया, एवंउसे कष्ट देकर विवश किया कि, वह उनकी अमानत को वापस करे । देवों द्वारा मिले हुए कष्टों से पीडित होकर अग्नि रुदन करने लगा, इसी से उसे ‘रुद्र’ नाम प्राप्त हुआ । उस समय सुअके नेत्रों से जो आसूँ गिरे उसीसे चॉंदी निर्माण हुयी, इसी लिए चॉंदी दानकर्म में वर्जित है। अन्त में अग्नि ने देखा कि, देव अपनी धनसम्पत्ति को वापस लिए जा रहे हैं, तब उसने उनसे कुछ भाग देने की प्रार्थना की । तब देवों ने अग्नि को ‘पुनराधान’ (यज्ञकर्मों में स्थान) दिया ।आगे चलकर मनु, पूषन्, त्वष्टु एवं धतृ इत्यादि ने यज्ञकर्म कर के ऐश्वर्य प्राप्त किया [तै.सं.१.५.१] । मनु ने भी लोगों के प्रकाशहेतु अग्नि की स्थापना की थी [ऋ.१.३६] । मनु का यज्ञ वर्तमान यज्ञ का ही प्रारंभक है, क्यों कि, इसके बाद जो भी यज्ञ किये गये, उन में इसके द्वारा दिये गये विधानोम को ही आधार मान कर देवों को हवि समर्पित की गयी [ऋ.१.७६.] । इस प्रकार की तुलनाओं को अक्सर क्रियाविशेषण शब्द ‘मनुष्वत्’ (मनुओं की भॉंति) द्वारा व्यक्ति किया गया है। यज्ञकर्ता भी अग्नि को उसी प्रकार यज्ञ का साधन बनाते हैं, जिस प्रकार मनुओं ने बनाया था [ऋ.१.४४] वे मनुओं की ई भॉंति अग्नि को प्रज्वलित करते हैं, तथा उसीकी भॉंति सोम अर्पित करते हैं [ऋ.७.२.४.३७] । सोम से उसी प्रकार प्रवाहित होने की स्तुति की गयी है, जैसे वह किसी समय मनु के लिए प्रवाहित होता था [ऋ.९.९६] । 
समकालीन ऋषि n.  मनु का अनेक प्राचीन यज्ञकर्ताओं के साथ उल्लेख मिलता है, जिनमें निम्नलिखित प्रमुख हैः---अंगिरस् और ययाति [ऋ.१.३१] । भृगु और अंगिरस [ऋ.८.४३], अथर्वन् और दध्यञ्च [ऋ.१.८०] । दध्यञ्च, अंगिरस्, अत्रि और कण्व [ऋ.१.१३९]। ऐसा कहा गया है कि, कुछ व्यक्तियों ने समय समय पर मनु को अग्नि प्रदान क्र उसे यज्ञ के लिए प्रतिष्ठित किया था, जिसके नाम इस प्रकार है---देव [ऋ.१.३६], मातरिश्वन, [ऋ.१.१२८] । मातरिश्वन् और देव [ऋ.१९.४६] ।, काव्य उश्सना [ऋ.८.२३] । ऋग्वेद के अनुसार, मनु विवस्वत ने इन्द्र के साथ बैठ कर सोमपान किया था [वाल.३] । तैत्तिरीय संहिता और शतपथ ब्राह्मण में मनु का अक्सर धार्मिक संस्कारादि करनेवाले के रुप में भी निर्देश किया गया है । 
मन्वंतरों का निर्माण n.  आदिपुरुष मनु के पश्चात्, पृथ्वी पर मनु नामक अनेक राजा निर्माण हुए, जिन्होने अपने नाम से नये-नये मन्वंतरो का निर्माण किया । ब्रह्मा के एक दिन तथा रात के कल्प कहते हैं । इनमें से ब्रह्मा के एक दिन के चौदह भाग माने गये हैं, जिनमें से हर एक को मन्वन्तर कहते हैं । पुराणों के अनुसार, इनमें से हर एक मन्वन्तर के काल में सृष्टि का नियंत्रण करनेवाला मनु अलग के काल में सृष्टि का नियंत्रण करनेवाला मनु अलग होता है, एवं उसीके नाम से उस मन्वन्तर का नामकारण किया गया है । इस प्रकार् जब तक वह मनु उस सृष्टि का अधिकारी रहता है, तब तक वह काल उसके नाम से विख्यात रहता है । 
चौदह मन्वंतर n.  इस तरह पुराणों में चौदह मन्वन्तर माने गये हैं, जो निम्नलिखित चौदह मनुओं के नाम से सुविख्यात हैः---१. स्वायंभुव,२.स्वारोचिष,३. उत्तम (औत्तम), ४. तामस, ५. रैवत,६. चाक्षुष, ७. वैवस्वत, ८. सावर्णि (अर्कसावर्णि) ९. दक्षसावर्णि, १०. ब्रह्मसावर्णि ११. धर्मसावर्णि १२. रुद्रसावर्णि, १३. रौच्य, १४. भौत्य । इनमें से स्वायंभुव से चाक्षुक्ष तक के मन्वन्तर हो चुके है, एवं वैवरवत मन्वंतर सांप्रत चालू है । बाकी मन्वंतर भविष्यकाल में होनेवाले हैं 
पाठभेद n.  चौदह मन्वन्तर के अधिपतियों मनु के नाम विभिन्न पुराणों में प्राप्त है । इनमें से स्वायंभुव से ले कर सावर्णि तक के पहले आठ मनु के नाम के बारे में सभी पुराणों मे प्रायः एकवाक्यता है, किंतु नौ से चौदह तक के मनु के नाभ के बारे में विभिन्न पाठभेद प्राप्त है, जो निम्नलिखित तालिका में दिये गये हैः--- 
९
वायु - सावर्ण
पद्म - रौच्य
मार्क - सूर्यसावर्णि
ब्रह्यवैत्तरी एवं भागवत - दक्षसावर्णि
मत्स्य - रौच्य
ब्रह्म - रैभ्य
विष्णु - दक्षसावर्णि

१०
वायु - सावर्ण
पद्म - भौत्य
मार्क - ब्रह्मसावर्णि
ब्रह्यवैत्तरी एवं भागवत - ब्रह्मसावर्णि
मत्स्य - मेरुसावर्णि
ब्रह्म - रौच्य
विष्णु - ब्रह्मसावर्णि

११
वायु - सावर्ण
पद्म - मेरुसावर्णि
मार्क - धर्मसावर्णि
ब्रह्यवैत्तरी एवं भागवत - धर्मसावर्णि
मत्स्य - ब्रह्मसावर्णि
ब्रह्म - मेरुसावर्णि
विष्णु - धर्मसावर्णि

१२
वायु - सावर्ण
पद्म - ऋभु
मार्क - रुद्रसावर्णि
ब्रह्यवैत्तरी एवं भागवत - रुद्रसावर्णि
मत्स्य - ऋतसावर्णि
ब्रह्म - - 
विष्णु - रुद्रसावर्णि

१३
वायु - रौच्य
पद्म - ऋतुधामन्
मार्क - रौच्य
ब्रह्यवैत्तरी एवं भागवत - देवसावर्णि
मत्स्य - ऋतधामन्
ब्रह्म - -
विष्णु - रौच्य

१४
वायु - भौत्य
पद्म - विष्वक्सेन 
मार्क - भौत्य 
ब्रह्यवैत्तरी एवं भागवत - इंद्रसावर्णि ( चंद्रसावर्णि )
मत्स्य - विश्वक्सेन
ब्रह्म - भौत्य
विष्णु - भौत्य 

The 14 Manus of the current aeon are::His Divine Grace A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada. Teachings of Lord Caitanya (Third Edition): The Golden Avatara. The Bhaktivedanta Book Trust. pp. 109\u2013.
ManvantaraName of Manu who is in charge:Lord Vishnu's Avatara:
1Svayambhuva ManuYajna
2Svarocisha ManuVibhu
3Uttama ManuSatyasena
4Tapasa ManuHari
5Raivata ManuVaikuntha
6Cakshusha ManuAjita
7Vaivasvata Manu (current)Vamana
8Savarni ManuSarvabhauma
9Daksha-savarni ManuRishabha
10Brahma-savarni ManuVishvaksena
11Dharma-savarni ManuDharmasetu
12Rudra-savarni ManuSudama
13Deva-savarni ManuYogesvara
14Indra-savarni ManuBrihadbhanu
स्वायंभुव मन्वन्तर  n.  
  1. मनु - स्वायंभुव ।
  2. सप्तर्षि---अंगिरस् (भृगु), अत्रि, क्रतु, पुलस्त्य, पुलह, मरीचि, वसिष्ठ ।
  3. देवगण---याम या शुक्र के जित, अजित् व जिताजित् ये तीन भेद था । प्रत्येक गण में बारह देव थे [वायु.३१.३-९] । उन गणों में निम्न देव थे-ऋचीक, गृणान, विभु,विश्वदेव,श्रुति,सोमपायिन्, [ब्रह्मांड. २.१३] । इन देवों में तुषित नामक बारह देवों का एक और गण था [भा.४.१.८] ।
  4. इन्द्र---विश्वभुज् (भागवतं मतानुसार यज्ञ) । इन्द्राणी ‘दक्षिणा’ थी [भा.८.१.६] ।
  5. अवतार---यज्ञ तथा कपिल (विष्णु एवं भागवत मतानुसार) ।
  6. पुत्र---अग्निबाहु (अग्निमित्र, अतिबाहु), अग्नीध्र (आग्नीध्र), ज्योतिष्मत्, द्युतिमत्, उत्र (वयुष्मत्, सत्र, सह), मेधस् (मेध,मेध्य), मेधातिथि, वसु (बाहु), सवन (सवल), हव्य (भव्य) । मार्कडेय के अनुसार, इसके पुत्रों में से पहले सात भूपाल थे । भागवत तथा वायु के अनुसार, इसे प्रियव्रत एवं उत्तानपाद नामक दो पुत्र थे । प्रियव्रत के दस पुत्र थे ।

स्वारोचिष मन्वंतर  n.  
  1. मनु --- स्वारोचिष । कई ग्रन्थों में इस मन्वन्तर के मनु का नाम ‘द्युतिमत्’ एवं ‘स्वारोचिस्’ बताया गया है । 
  2. सप्तर्षि---अर्ववीर (उर्वरीवान्, ऊर्ज,और्व), ऋषभ (कश्यप,काश्यप),दत्त (अत्रि), निश्च्यवन (निश्चर,ल),प्राण,बृहस्पति (अग्नि,आलि), स्तम्ब (ऊर्जस्तंब, ऊर्जस्वल) । ब्रह्मांड में स्वारोषित मन्वन्तर के कई ऋषियों के कुलनाम देकर उन्हें सप्तर्षियों का पूर्वज कहा गया है । 
  3. देवगण---तुषित, इडस्पति,इध्म,कवि,तोष,प्रतोष,भद्र,रोचन,विभु,शांति,सुदेव (स्वह्र), पारावत । 
  4. इन्द्र---विपश्चित् । भागवत के अनुसार, यज्ञपुत्र रोचन । 
  5. अवतार---तुषितपुत्र अजित (विभु) । 
  6. पुत्र---अयस्मय अपोमूर्ति (आपमूर्ति), ऊर्ज, किंपुरुष, कृतान्त, चैत्र,ज्योति (रोचिष्मत्,रवि), नभ,(नव,नभस्य),प्रतीत (प्रथित, प्रसृति, बृहदुक्थ), भानु, विभृत,श्रुत,सुकृति (सुषेण), सेतु, हविघ्न (हविघ्न), इसके पुत्रों के ऐसे कुछ नाम मिलते हैं, किन्तु उनमें से कुल नौ या दस की संख्या प्राप्त है । मत्स्य के अनुसार, इस मन्वन्तर में ऋषियों की सहायता के लिए वसिष्ठपुत्र सात प्रजापति बने थे । किन्तु उन सब के नाम मनु पुत्रों के नामों से मिलते हैं, जैसे-आप, ज्योति,मूर्ति,रय, सृकृत,स्मय तथा हस्तीन्द्र ।

उत्तम मन्वन्तर  n.  
  1. मनु --- उत्तम । 
  2. सप्तर्षि---अनघ,ऊर्ध्वबाहु,गात्र, रज, शुक्र (शुक्ल), सवन, सुतपस्। ये सब वसिष्ठपुत्र थे, एवं वासिष्ठ इनका सामान्य नाम था । पूर्वजन्म में ये सभी हिरण्यगर्भ के ऊर्ज नामक पुत्र थे । 
  3. देवगण---प्रतर्दन (भद्र.भानुं,भावन,मानव), वशवर्तिन् (वेदश्रुति), शिव, सत्य, सुधामन् । इन सबके बारह बारह के गण थे । 
  4. इन्द्र---सुशांति (सुकीर्ति,सत्यजित्) । 
  5. अवतार---सत्या का पुत्र सत्य,अथवा धर्म तथा सुनृता का पुत्र सत्यसेन । 
  6. पुत्र---अज,अप्रतिम,(इष,ईष), ऊर्ज,तनूज (तनूर्ज,तर्ज), दिव्य (दिव्यौषधि, देवांबुज), नभ (नय), नभस्य (पवन,परश्रु,परशुचि),,मधु,माधव,शुक्र, शुचि (शुति,सुकेतु) ।

तामस मन्वन्तर n.  
  1. मनु --- तामस । 
  2. सप्तर्षि---अकपि (अकपीवत्), अग्नि,कपि (कपीवत्), काव्य (कवि,चरक), चैत्र (जन्यु,जह्रु, जल्प), ज्योतिर्धर्मन् (ज्योतिर्धामन्, धनद), धातृ (धीमत्, पीवर),पृथु । 
  3. देवगण---वीर,वैधृति,सत्य (सत्यक,साध्य), सुधी, सुरुप,हरि । मार्कण्डेय के अनुसार, इनकी कुल संख्या सत्ताइस है । अन्य ग्रंथों में उल्लेख आता है किम, ये पुत्र एक एक न होकर सत्ताइस सत्ताइस देवों के गण थे । 
  4. इन्द्र---शिखि (त्रिशिख, शिबि) । 
  5. अवतार---हरि, जो हरिमेध तथा हरिणी का पुत्र था । इसे एक स्थान हर्या का पुत्र कहा गया है । 
  6. पुत्र---अकल्मष (अकल्माष), कृतबंधु,कृशाश्व, केतु,क्षांति,खाति (ख्याति)जानुजंघ,तन्वीन्,तपस्य, तपोद्युति (द्युति), तपोधन, तपोभागिन्, तपोमूल, तपोयोगिन्, तपोरति, दृढेषुधि, दान्त, धन्विन्, नर, परंतप, परीक्षित, पृथु,प्रस्थल,प्रियभृत, शयहय,शांत (शांति), शुभ, सनातन, सुतपस् । 
  7. योगवर्धन---कौकुरुण्डि, दाल्भ्य, प्रवहण, शङ्ग, शिव, सस्मित, सित । ये योगवर्धन केवल इसी मन्वंतर में मिलते हैं ।

रैवत मन्वन्तर n.  
  1.  मनु---रैवत । 
  2. सप्तर्षि---ऊर्ध्वबाहु (सोमप), देवबाहु (वेदबाहु), पर्जन्य,महामुनि (मुनि, वसिष्ठ,सत्यनेत्र), यदुध्र, वेदशिरस (वेदश्री, सप्ताश्रु, सुधामन्, सुबाहु,स्वधामन्), हिरण्यरोमन् (हिरण्यलोमन्) । 
  3. देवगण---आभूतरजस् (भूतनय, भूतरजय) । इसके रैभ्य तथा पारिप्लव (वारिप्लव) ये दो भेद हैं । इसके अतिरिक्त अमिताभ, प्रकृति, वैकुंठ, शुभा आदि देवगणों में प्रत्येक में १४ व्यक्ति हैं । 
  4. इन्द्र---विभु । 
  5. अवतार---विष्णु के अनुसार संभूतिपुत्र मानस, तथा भागवत के अनुसार शुभ्र तथा विकुंठा का पुत्र ‘वैकुंठ’। 
  6. पुत्र---अव्यय (हव्यप), अरण्य (आरण्य), अरुण, अर्जुन, कवि (कपि), कंबु, कृतिन्, तत्त्वदर्शिन्, धृतिकृत, धृतिमत्, निरामित्र, निरुत्सुक, निर्मोह, प्रकाश (प्रकाशक), बलबंधु, बाल, महावीर्य, युक्त, वित्तवत्, विंध्य, शुचि, शृंग, सत्यक, सत्यवाच, सुयष्टव्य (सुसंभाव्य), हरहन्।

चाक्षुष मन्वन्तर  n.  
  1. मनु---चाक्षुष । 
  2. सप्तर्षि---अतिनामन्, उत्तम (उन्नत, भृगु), नभ (नाभ, मधु), विरजस् (वीरक), विवस्वत (हविष्मत्), सहिष्णुइ, सुधामन्, सुमेधस् । 
  3. देवगण---आद्य (आप्य), ऋभ, ऋभु, पृथग्भाव (प्रथुक-ग, यूथग), प्रसूत, भव्य (भाव्य,) वारि (वारिमूल), लेख । 
  4. इन्द्र---भवानुभव या मनोजव अथवा मंत्रद्रुम ।
  5. अवतार---विष्णु मतानुसार विकुंठापुत्र वैकुंठ, तथा भागवत मतानुसार वैराज तथा संभूति का पुत्र अजित् । 
  6. पुत्र---अग्निष्टुत, अतिरात्र, अभिमन्यु, ऊरु (रुरु) कृति, तपस्विन्, पुरु(पुरुष,पूरु), शतद्युम्न, सत्यवाच्‍, सुद्युम्न ।

वैवस्वत मन्वन्तर  n.  
  1. मनु --- वैवस्वत । 
  2. सप्तर्षि---अत्रि, कश्यप (काश्यप,वत्सर), गौतम (शरद्वत्), जमदग्नि, भरद्वाज (भारद्वज), वसिष्ठ (वसुमत), विश्वामित्र । 
  3. देवगण---आंगिरस (दस), अश्विनी (दो), आदित्य (बारह), भृगुदेव (दस), मरुत (उन्चास), रुद्र (ग्यारह), वसु (आठ), विश्वेदेव (दस), साध्य (बारह) । 
  4. इन्द्र---ऊर्जास्विन् या पुरंदर या महाबल । 
  5. अवतार---वामन । 
  6. पुत्र---अरिषट (दिष्ट,नाभागारिष्ट, नाभानेदिष्ट, रिष्ट, नेदिष्ट, उद्विष्ट), इक्ष्वाकु इल (सुद्युम्न),करुष, कृशनाभ धृष्ट (धृष्णु), नभ (नभग, नाभाग), नृग, पृशध्र, प्रांशु,वसुमत्, शर्याति ।

सावर्णि मन्वन्तर n.  
  1.  मनु --- सावर्णि ।
  2. सप्तर्षि---अश्वत्थामन्, (द्रोणि), और्व (काश्यप, रुरु, श्रुंग), कृप (शरद्वत, शारद्वत्), गालव (कौशिक), दीप्तिमत्, राम (परशुराम जामदग्न्य), व्यास (शतानंद, पाराशर्य) । 
  3. देवगण---अमिताभ (अमृतप्रभ), मुख्य (सुख,विरज), सुतप (सुतपस्, तप) । 
  4. इन्द्र---बलि (वैरोचन) । बलि वैरोचन की आसक्ति इन्द्रपद पर नहीं रहती है । अतएव कालान्तर में इन्द्रपद छोडकर वह सिद्धगति को प्राप्त करेगा । 
  5. अवतार---देवगुह्य तथा सरस्वती का पुत्र सार्वभौम अवतार होगा, तथा बलि के बाद वह सब व्यवस्था देखेगा । 
  6. पुत्र---अधृष्ट (अधृष्णु), अध्वरीवत् (अवरीयस्, अर्ववीर, उर्वरीयस्, (वीरवत), अपि, अरिष्ट (चरिष्णु,विष्णु), आज्य, ईडय, कृति, (धृति, धृतिमत्), निर्मोह, यवसस्, वसु, वरीयस्, वाच् (वाजवाजिन्, विरज,विरजस्क), वैरिशमन, शुक्र, सत्यवाच्, सुमति ।

दक्षसावर्णि मन्वन्तर  n.  
  1. मनु --- दक्षसावर्णि । 
  2. सप्तर्षि---ज्योतिष्मत्, द्युतिमत, मेधातिथि (मेधामृति, माधातिथि), वसु, सत्य (सुतपास, पौलह), सबल (सवन, वसित, वसिन), हव्यवाहन (हव्य, भव्य) । 
  3. देव---दक्षपुत्र हरित के पुत्र निर्मोह, पार (पर,संभूत), मरिचिगर्भ, सुधर्म, सुधर्मन, सुशर्माण । इनमें से हर एक के साथ बारह व्यक्ति हैं । 
  4. इन्द्र---कार्तिकेय ही आगे चलकर अद्‌भुत नाम से इन्द्र होगा । 
  5. अवतार---आयुष्मत् एवं अंबुधारा का पुत्र ऋषभ अवतार होगा । 
  6. पुत्र---अनीक (ऋ.चीक, अर्चिष्मत्, नाक), खड्‌गहस्त (पंचहस्त, पंचहोत्र, शापहस्त), गय, दीप्तिकेतु (दासकेतु, बर्हकेतु), धृष्टकेतु (धृतिकेतु, भूतकेतु), निराकृति (निरामय), पुथुश्रवस् (पृथश्रवस्), बृहत (बृहद्रथ, बृहद्यश,) भूरिद्युम्न ।

ब्रह्मसावर्णि मन्वन्तर  n.  
  1. मनु --- ब्रह्मसावर्णि । 
  2. सप्तर्षि---आपांमूर्ति (आपोमूर्ति), अप्रतिम (अप्रतिमौजस, प्रतिम,प्रामति), अभिमन्यु (नभस, सप्तकेतु), अष्टम (वसिष्ठ, वशिष्ठ, सत्य,सद्य), नभोग (नाभाग),सुकृति (सुकीर्ति), हविष्मति । 
  3. देव---अर्चि सुखामन, सुखासीन, सुधाम, सुधामान, सुवासन, धूम,निरुद्ध, विरुद्ध । 
  4. इन्द्र---शान्ति नामक इन्द्र होगा । 
  5. अवतार---विश्वसृष्टय के गृह में विषूचि के गर्भ से विष्वक्सेन नाम्क अवतार होगा । 
  6. पुत्र---अनमित्र निरामित्र, उत्तमौजस, जयद्रथ, निकुषंश, भूरिद्युम्न, भूरिषेण, भूरिसेन, वीरवत् (वीर्यवत्), वृषभ, बृषसेन,शतानीक, सुक्षेत्र, सुपर्वन, सुवर्चस, हरिषेण।

धर्मसावर्णि मन्वन्तर  n.  
  1. मनु---धर्मसावर्णि । 
  2. सप्तर्षि---अग्नितेजस्, अनघ (तनय, नग, भग), अरुण (आरुणि, तरुण, वारुणि), उदधिष्णन् (उरुधिष्ण्य, पुष्टि, विष्टि, विष्णु), निश्चर, वपुष्मत्, (ऋ.ष्टि), हविष्मत् ।
  3. देव---तीस कामग (काम-गम, कामज), तीस निर्माणरत (निर्वाणरति, निर्वाणरुचि), तीस मनोजव (विहंगम) । 
  4. इन्द्र---वृष (वृषन्, वैधृत) इन्द्र होगा । 
  5. अवतार---इस मन्वन्तर के अवतार का नाम धर्मसेतु है, जो धर्म (आर्यक) एवं वैधृति के पुत्र के रुम में जन्म लेनेवाला है । 
  6. पुत्र---आदर्श, क्षेमधन्वन् (क्षेमधर्मन्, हेमधन्वन्), गृहेषु (दृढायु), देवानीक, पुरुद्वह (पुरोवह) पौण्ड्रक (पंडक), मत (मनु, मरु), संवर्तक (सर्वग, सर्वत्रग, सर्ववेग, सत्यधर्म), सर्वधर्मन (सुधर्मन्, सुशर्मन्) ।

रुद्रसावर्णि मन्वन्तर  n.  
  1. मनु---रुद्रसावर्णि । 
  2. सप्तर्षि---तपस्विन, तपोधन, (तपोनिधि, तमोशन, तपोधृति, तपोमति), तपोमूर्ति, तपोरति (तपोरवि), द्युति (अग्निध्रक, कृति), सुतपस्। 
  3. देव---रोहित (लोहित), सुकर्मन् (सुवर्ण), सुतार (तार,सुधर्मन्,सुपार), सुमनस्। 
  4. इन्द्र---ऋतधामन् नामक इन्द्र होनेवाला है । ५. अवतार---सत्यसहस् तथा सूनृता का पुत्र स्वधामन् अवतार होगा ।६. पुत्र---उपदेव (अहूर), देववत् (देववायू,) देवश्रेष्ठ, मित्रकृत (अमित्रहा, मित्रहा), मित्रदेव (चित्रसेन, मित्रबिंदु, मित्रविंद,) मित्रबाहु, मित्रवत्, विदूरथ, सुवर्चस्।

रौच्य मन्वन्तर  n.  
  1. मनु---रौच्य । 
  2. सप्तर्षि---अव्यव (पथ्यवत्, हव्याप) तत्वदर्शिन्, द्युतिमत्, निरुत्सुक, निर्मोक, निष्कंप, निष्प्रकंप, सुतपस् । 
  3. देव---सुकर्मन्. सुत्रामन (सुशर्मन), सुधर्मन् । प्रत्येक देवगण तीस देवों का होगा । 
  4. इन्द्र---दिवस्पति (दिवस्वामिन्) । 
  5. अवतार---देवहोत्र तथा बृहती का पुत्र अवतार होगा ।
  6. पुत्र---अनेक क्षत्रबद्ध (क्षत्रविद्ध, क्षत्रविद्धि, क्षत्रवृद्धि), चित्रसेन, तप (नय, नियति), धर्मधृत, (धर्मभृत, सुव्रत), धृत (भव), निर्भय, पृथ (दृध), विचित्र, सुतपस् (सुरस), सुनेत्र ।

भौत्य मन्वन्तर n.  
  1. मनु---भौत्य । 
  2. सप्तर्षि---अग्निबाहु (अतिबाहु), अग्निध्र (आग्नीध्र), अजित, भार्गव (मागध, माधव, श्वाजित), मुत (युक्त), शुक्र, शुचि । 
  3. देव---कनिष्ठ, चाक्षुष, पवित्र, भाजित (भाजिर, भ्राजिर), वाचावृद्ध (धारावृक) । प्रत्येक के साथ पॉंच पॉंच देव होगे । 
  4. इन्द्र---शुचि ही इस समय इन्द्र होगा । 
  5. अवतार---सत्रायण एवं विताना का पुत्र बृहद्भानु अवतार होगा । 
  6. पुत्र---अभिमानिन् (श्रीमानिन्), उग्र (ऊरु, अनुग्रह), कृतिन् (जिष्णु, विष्णु), गभीर (तरंगभीरु), गुरु, तरस्वान् (बुद्ध, बुद्धि,ब्रध्न), तेजस्विन्, (ऊर्जस्विन्, ओजस्विन्), प्रतीर (प्रवीण), शुचि, शुद्ध, सबल, सुबल) ।


We have tried our best to check facts. But We are humans. Human nature is to do mistake . so please verify facts, if you feel we are wrong. We are sorry for that.In case you find any mistake in our video , then inform us. we will try to rectify it. English To Hindi translations are not in literal sense.Please do not use social media for news. Before believing any news on social media, confirm it from any reliable source. 
हमने तथ्यों की जांच करने की पूरी कोशिश की है, लेकिन हम इंसान हैं| मानव प्रकृति गलती करना है|अगर आपको लगता है कि हम गलत हैं, तो कृपया तथ्यों की पुष्टि करें।यदि आप हमारे वीडियो में कोई गलती पाते हैं, तो हमें सूचित करें। हम इसे सुधारने का प्रयास करेंगे|अंग्रेजी से हिंदी अनुवाद शाब्दिक अर्थों में नहीं हैं|
कृपया समाचार के लिए सोशल मीडिया का उपयोग न करें। सोशल मीडिया के किसी भी खबर पर विश्वास करने से पहले, किसी विश्वसनीय स्रोत से इसकी पुष्टि करें|